But they ARE charging us through the nose, 40 bucks for a glorified DLC? No thanks CapcomCodeman90 said:I guarantee you any other company would charge through the nose for the amount of stuff in the Ultimate Marvel Vs. Capcom 3 game.
As opposed to $5 a character with MK. Yeah.....Furioso said:But they ARE charging us through the nose, 40 bucks for a glorified DLC? No thanks CapcomCodeman90 said:I guarantee you any other company would charge through the nose for the amount of stuff in the Ultimate Marvel Vs. Capcom 3 game.
You sir are too polite , I sure as hell think they are lying , through their teeth. Announce new game , fans get mad , blame mother nature . Hell i guess that means that UMvC3 is an act of GOD ?chuckey said:somehow i find this hard to believe. They had time to make a whole new disc yet couldn't work out DLC? I'm not saying they are lying but it doesn't make any sense to me.
THOU SHALT NERF SENTINEL OR SUFFER THY WRATH.krazykidd said:Hell i guess that means that UMvC3 is an act of GOD ?
...But you were perfectly happy with paying $60 for it in the current pricing system...Furioso said:But they ARE charging us through the nose, 40 bucks for a glorified DLC? No thanks Capcom
Yea that's also ridiculous, but it still doesn't excuse capcomNinjamedic said:As opposed to $5 a character with MK. Yeah.....Furioso said:But they ARE charging us through the nose, 40 bucks for a glorified DLC? No thanks CapcomCodeman90 said:I guarantee you any other company would charge through the nose for the amount of stuff in the Ultimate Marvel Vs. Capcom 3 game.
Yet Capcom are the ones being crucified.Furioso said:Yea that's also ridiculous, but it still doesn't excuse capcom
Watching this is like the Furious 4 fiasco. People are going to whine no matter what.Kaiser6012 said:P.S I wonder what would have happened if they DID release DLC along the way. People would probably complain that Capcom didn't add enough stuff into the Ultimate disc to justify it. Damned if you do and damned if you don't.
Has any other japanese developer used this excuse yet?DustyDrB said:But then the earthquake didn't force them to re-release the game within the same calendar year either (nine months apart). This is despicable of them to try to use a tragedy as their excuse when it is clearly not the case.
There have been only 2 SF4 re-releases.Golem239 said:You know I have to ask what about people who don't have systems connected to online? if it was released for DLC then they would have alienated a part of community (not sticking up for their actions or excuses I don't care about this ultimate marvel vs capcom because I'm not surprised one bit (released god knows how many street fighter 2s 4 street fighter 4s after they said said they was gonna be only one))
Sorry about that fix it immediatelyNinjamedic said:There have been only 2 SF4 re-releases.Golem239 said:You know I have to ask what about people who don't have systems connected to online? if it was released for DLC then they would have alienated a part of community (not sticking up for their actions or excuses I don't care about this ultimate marvel vs capcom because I'm not surprised one bit (released god knows how many street fighter 2s 4 street fighter 4s after they said said they was gonna be only one))
Its fine, I just try to be helpful and polite on threads like these to balance them out a little.Golem239 said:Sorry about that fix it immediately
Has any other Japanese developer released an unfinished game and then re-released a version of it that isn't cross-compatible with the original only nine months later?Ninjamedic said:Has any other japanese developer used this excuse yet?DustyDrB said:But then the earthquake didn't force them to re-release the game within the same calendar year either (nine months apart). This is despicable of them to try to use a tragedy as their excuse when it is clearly not the case.
So that's a no then?DustyDrB said:Has any other Japanese developer released an unfinished game and then re-released a version of it that isn't cross-compatible with the original only nine months later?
And likewise?Ninjamedic said:So that's a no then?DustyDrB said:Has any other Japanese developer released an unfinished game and then re-released a version of it that isn't cross-compatible with the original only nine months later?