DIZ-17 said:
S/he should have turned on the air conditioner then it wouldn't be so hot.
I'm using Diz's post as an example.
It's interesting to me to hear people automatically fault the user in this case. It's not microsofts fault for having a device that automatically takes pics. Or not having an interface that makes it easy to manage what you want to do with this function or the pics that it takes. Delete? Someone had to go to a forum to ask other users how to use this function, assuming it is a function.
I've played games naked. I've played multiplayer games naked. Why fault the user for undressing in the privacy of their own home because they're getting hot? Why assume they have air conditioning? It's winter in half the world and summer in the rest. Maybe they're in New Zealand and also poor. Naked IS air conditioning in that case.
I have a digital camera. Should I assume it's taking pictures all the time? What about my laptop camera? I have a friend with an x-box 360 camera attachment. Should that also be something to watch out for?
When it comes to faulting people, it makes sense to start at the origin, and work down. The device was made by designers at Microsoft. They somehow went against convention of user freedom of choice in operating the device to say, "snap a photo every X seconds (X could be greater than 60 seconds)." I can understand the logic; it has no interface aside from motion, so automate some functions. But photosnaps? Automatic photos of people in their private world? I'm a designer of a different school of design, and I can tell you that's shit thinking on Microsofts part.
The naked person is free and clear in my book. I've done all kinds of unspeakable in my living room, WHILE a game is being played. Automatic photo function is... not welcome.
(I just had a scary realization... it's a total voyeur cam! O_O If someone doesn't know that the device automatically snaps photos, you could spy on them. o_o I'm covering EVERY kinect I see forever on.)