Well yea, but that's kinda beside the point. It's not a conspiracy theory that 9/11 happened. They pulled it off with a fairly standard operation that the US simply wasn't prepared for, if for no other reason than no one had ever done it before.Scabadus said:I'm not sure... this is true for the classics such as Area 51 with it's hundreds of scientists or the Illuminati with figures in every country, but think about the biggest conspiracy in the post-internet era: 9/11. How many people would actually have had to be conspiring for this? I'm not saying I think this is true, but say an oil barron (or.. whatever, I don't really know the conspiracy) decided it would be best for everyone if America went to war with Afghanistahn and Iraq; a small bribe to a security guard and some diverted funds to a terrorist cell could well have done the job. Possibly some smuggling or some such too, but my point is that most of this is logistics "move package A to point B," not people specificaly acting to blow up American infrastructure. From what I do know about 9/11 America's defence forces were woefully unprepared for any such attack so there was no need for traitors at every level of govornment as some poeople claim, hell even a bribed guard who let the metal through the airport gate wouldn't have known what it was for until the first explosion and you can be sure they'd keep quiet about it afterwards.
My point was that there aren't shadowy cabals out there trying to take over the world from behind the scenes and that the news as reported to the masses is usually the truth, if incomplete (at least once you filter out the sensationalism, bias, exaggerations, et al, preferably by exposure to other sources). People as a whole simply aren't competent enough at what they do to be able to run things and avoid all public scrutiny.