I was puzzled by this. It's off-topic, but a lot of expressions and terms are used as if they are inherent to human nature. These words are also used a lot when describing someone that lacks this nature (for example, when people discuss a recent event using words like 'inhuman' and 'what a monstrous act')ravensheart18 said:There is this thing called human compassion, but it is true not everyone has it.
I would have done this, specificly: well spoken but without being dishonest and not being overly politically correct.Wenseph said:I don't think I would have gone to anything like this. If I considered the person a friend I would, but not if didn't really know them or they were assholes. I would have said it in a good way though.
Without even taking who was being an arse to whom more, and how much the two parties seemed to dislike one another, I think it's hypocritical to suddenly start caring for someone if something happens to them. Just because you attended the same class or in the same year, doesn't mean you should care. If he was a year your senior, or if he attended but you never met, (how) would it be different?
If your neighbor had cancer, but you've never met, would you go to the charity event? As far as being the better man: if my neighbor always had his music way too loud and I always complained to him about it on a weekly basis, then I would definetaly try and help him out.
Maybe it's more the significance than the terms of the relationship that matters (to me). Being on bad terms means more to me (probably in a negative way) than having passed eachother on the stairway a few times.