SinisterDeath said:
Treblaine said:
SinisterDeath said:
PS3 mics, aren't cheap. $60 for a bluetooth head set? Maybe $40?
You don't need a Bluetooth headset, one of these USB mics for $15 should be enough
Only idiots buy USB mics, when you got a Blue tooth capable system.
You know, wireless all the way?
Cheaper option that works just as well. Seems pretty smart to me.
Wireless is a good option but so is saving $45. It's not like you are going to be jumping around the room or anything, wired can be simpler and clearer. Also with a mic rather than Bluetooth Headset you can wear headphones if you don't want to wake your neighbours/house-mates from the noise of your tv's speakers.
Yog Sothoth said:
Treblaine said:
Yog Sothoth said:
If by " "more juvenile" he actually meant more online supported games, a larger player base and an overall more stable and superior network, then yes, I agree 100%...
What tha... huh?
You do realise that MAG has a TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY SIX player cap? With Dedicated servers? And SO many other PS3 exclusive games have low-lag dedicated servers like Warhawk as well as Resistance FoM and R2. Resistance 2 had a freaking 64 player cap on huge low lag maps as well as eight player cooperative playthrough way back in early 2008 and it's still going strong.
What the hell are you talking about "less online support" or "more stable and superior". I mean big titles like Halo 3 have a player cap of only 16. The pay-wall for XBL blocks out the majority of XBox 360 owners from online multiplayer, encouraging a huge proportion to never go online. Also it prevents any game adding casual online access like with Demon's Souls there there is subtle but significant interaction between all the players around the world.
I think the lack of bundled mics is good, acts like an idiot barrier. You'd only go to the trouble of getting a USB mic if you really wanted to contribute something constructive, the same applies for PC gaming as well. The bundled 360 mic is just annoying, especially if you play with headphones and I wish I could buy a better quality mic.
Warhawk...? What's that, never heard of it...
Yes, the player cap in MAG is impressive, but I still think that Live is the better service of the two... Xbox and PSN have about the same number of subscribers last I checked, ergo Sony's free service is
just comparable to Xbox Live with it's fees... What does that tell you?
Also, there are a number of games on Xbox that have dedicated servers as well... Left 4 Dead is the first that comes to mind, but I know that there are others...
EDIT: Also want to remind people here that Xbox Live
costs less than $5 a month... If you're gonna pay hundreds of dollars for a console & games, you should be able to easily afford the fees for online service.
Have you even TRIED PS3's online? I own both consoles and have tried both and I can state with confidence that XBL is terrible in comparison to PSN while PSN is remarkably close to PC... which I consider the best BTW.
Saying XBL is only $5 per month is a fallacious reductionist argument. You can't just arbitrarily divide the cost of something by smaller units of time till you get an insignificant number. That's like saying a Ferrari isn't expensive if you pay $10 per day... for the rest of your life.
I mean would you pay me $5 per month? Honestly, I can arrange this through pay pal. After all, it is an "insignificant" amount of money. Of course not. The XBL Gold Membership fee is a significant cost that doesn't even go to fund the overwhelming minority of 360 games that have dedicated server support like L4D. It goes directly into Microsoft's bank account.
The bottom line is you are paying for a service which my all technical benchmarks is worse than the free alternative! It's not like the PS3 is significantly more expensive any more and you don't have to shell out on a load of expensive proprietary peripherals as you do with 360.
But the fact that Microsoft claim they are so big on online gaming yet for their two biggest franchises, Halo and Gears of War, they don't bother with dedicated servers at all!?!? It just shows where their priorities really are.