Xbox One "Will Do Very Little" Without Day-One Patch

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
Strazdas said:
canadamus_prime said:
Ok so they said that a day one patch would be required some time ago, but that's not quite the same thing as saying the thing won't do anything without the day one patch. Not that either case is particularly acceptable.
They said that the Xbox will not play games without internet connection, and the only way to remove this block is to download a patch, which, requires internet connection. and since as soon as you connect it will decide to download day 0 patch, it kinda is not doing anything without the patch.
Right. Well still a massive misstep for Microsoft. The depressing thing is, as I've mentioned before, is that Microsoft will still sell a buttload of these.
Strazdas said:
Glaice said:
So what is stopping MS from shipping the Xbox One with a DVD with the essential patch for those with crappy or no internet?
They have said that it would be "too much work" for them.
Translation: They couldn't be bothered to.
 

theApoc

New member
Oct 17, 2008
252
0
0
Strazdas said:
No, PS4 will not NEED an update on day 0 to work. Xbox will NEED an update on day 0 to work. PS4 will be able to do more with an update, but if you have no internet you can still use PS4. You cant for Xbox.
PS4 was marketed with "Games first". It is true that microsoft has always tried to push it more as a TV watching system and skype calls box than anything related to games. Though that still does not mean it must require internet.
You can take a weapon and use it as a paperweight, so shooting isnt the only aspect its capable of, still its main purpose is still shooting. same is for games on game consoles.

MS was upfront about it, you are correct. and due to this they received reserved criticism. Then again, you have to take MS statements with a grain of salt when it seems that a week afterwards they claim something completely opposite as was shown multiple times with advertisement. And when you cant trust the word of manufacturer, who do you trust?

No, i said my phone can do its primal fucntion without internet. this is true fact. you somehow try to claim otherwise.
As stated in the review of the PS4:

We can report that we put Knack in to test the console, and were forced to download an update before jumping in, and then had to restart the PS4 and install the upgrade. The whole process took about 10 minutes start to finish. The updates needed to play when the PlayStation releases on November 15th may be harder to obtain due to server overload, but when you do finally get in to start playing with Sony's new tech, I don't think you'll be disappointed.
So in the end you are splitting hairs. PS4 will work without a network connection, however for what you will get for your $400 by not connecting to the internet, it may as well be an XBOX One. You need an internet connection to use the features of these consoles. Period. If you don't have one, you are wasting money. Period.

And your phone, cannot make calls without connecting to a network, be it the cellular, internet, satellite or old fashioned cable. It is useless without the network just like any other inter connected device. You are confusing internet with network. These consoles need network connectivity to access the internet. They do not HAVE to be connected to the "internet".

Look, I get what you are saying, I actually do. Things should work "out of the box", but that is not the world we live in when it comes to electronics. And neither company has been decietful about it's intentions. Assumption and interpretation aside. There are MANY reasons for always online. For digital licenses locking content to a console. For limiting license transfer. And very few of them ONLY benefit Sony or MS.
 

Crazie_Guy

New member
Mar 8, 2009
305
0
0
Microsoft have been making it very clear what level of competency they intend to operate on this generation with all their press, and it's good to know that they're going to be following through on that.
 

latenightapplepie

New member
Nov 9, 2008
3,086
0
0
Well, I don't have the internet at my current house, so...

Oh well, I'm not getting either of the new consoles for at least 2-3 months anyway. Possibly longer.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
theApoc said:
As stated in the review of the PS4:

We can report that we put Knack in to test the console, and were forced to download an update before jumping in, and then had to restart the PS4 and install the upgrade. The whole process took about 10 minutes start to finish. The updates needed to play when the PlayStation releases on November 15th may be harder to obtain due to server overload, but when you do finally get in to start playing with Sony's new tech, I don't think you'll be disappointed.
So in the end you are splitting hairs. PS4 will work without a network connection, however for what you will get for your $400 by not connecting to the internet, it may as well be an XBOX One. You need an internet connection to use the features of these consoles. Period. If you don't have one, you are wasting money. Period.

And your phone, cannot make calls without connecting to a network, be it the cellular, internet, satellite or old fashioned cable. It is useless without the network just like any other inter connected device. You are confusing internet with network. These consoles need network connectivity to access the internet. They do not HAVE to be connected to the "internet".

Look, I get what you are saying, I actually do. Things should work "out of the box", but that is not the world we live in when it comes to electronics. And neither company has been decietful about it's intentions. Assumption and interpretation aside. There are MANY reasons for always online. For digital licenses locking content to a console. For limiting license transfer. And very few of them ONLY benefit Sony or MS.
question is, did they try to play with a console before plugging it online? because Playstation always worked in a way of "if offline" it works normally, but if its online it wont let you do anything till you update. kinda shitty way of treating it, but not an actual test whether it will work without an update if they conencted it from the beginning.

I agree that people without internet buying new console are wasting their money, but i dont agree that the consoles are of equal (or adequate) quality at launch.

My phone will need cellular network to make calls (cellular network is not internet network). It will not need any network to do everything else. I can easily buy a phone and paly games on it without connecting it to cellular network ever. On the Xbox One however you will have to need network in order to do things that do not need such network. This is a FAULT in design.

Yes, the thing should work out of the box. And all electronics do, except the new consoles, which is why there is a problem. This was the world we lived on till those consoles launched. they made the change, hence we are angry.
License transfer should not be limited. digital games must be resellable. but thats another discussion. So your "benefits" arent actually benefits. they are limitations.
 

theApoc

New member
Oct 17, 2008
252
0
0
Strazdas said:
I agree that people without internet buying new console are wasting their money, but i dont agree that the consoles are of equal (or adequate) quality at launch.

My phone will need cellular network to make calls (cellular network is not internet network). It will not need any network to do everything else. I can easily buy a phone and paly games on it without connecting it to cellular network ever. On the Xbox One however you will have to need network in order to do things that do not need such network. This is a FAULT in design.

Yes, the thing should work out of the box. And all electronics do, except the new consoles, which is why there is a problem. This was the world we lived on till those consoles launched. they made the change, hence we are angry.
License transfer should not be limited. digital games must be resellable. but thats another discussion. So your "benefits" arent actually benefits. they are limitations.
I agree, the XBOX One is actually a lot more value for your money at launch, even with an update requirement. PS4 may play games "out of the box" but that is pretty much all it will do. Hell you can't even play CD's in the thing. Once connected to the internet, it gains a lot of features, but those things are still years behind what is offered by XBL.

It can't be a fault in design if they intended it to be used as such. Your phone is not intended to work without a network, unlike something like a radio station. They broadcast and there are receivers available. No direct connection. Network connectivity allows a back and forth by default. XBOX One needs an update to run 100%, so does PS4. They made the importance of network connections very clear. They were BOTH designed that way. It is not a failure, in this case it is a feature.

On you last point, that is simply untrue. Very few electronic things simply work out of the box. Phones all need updates, and account linkages, and any number of other updates. TVs, require other devices to function 100%. Sorry, but that statement is simply not true.

With the launch of PS4 and some of the problems I am seeing, I think consumer expectation is way too high. It is a robust piece of hardware, being shipped all over the world. It may sit in a warehouse for months and the OS is not a stagnant entity. I think you should be happy they are willing and able to update. And seriously, you are actually complaining that they want to make these things better over time.
 

Barbas

ExQQxv1D1ns
Oct 28, 2013
33,804
0
0
Well, it's a pretty good reason to save several hundred dollars. Bright side, people!
 

Fox12

AccursedT- see you space cowboy
Jun 6, 2013
4,828
0
0
smithy_2045 said:
How can anyone with even the slightest bit of intelligence be surprised by this news? They were forced to drastically alter their strategy for the One very late in the development cycle. Of course they're going to have to patch it day 1, most of the launch consoles were likely built and loaded with the software that assumed their cloud-based DRM would be used.

Please use a little bit of common sense before jumping on the MS hate bandwagon for once...
But the mere fact that any of this is necessary justifies people anger. Not that the PS4 won't need some sort of Day 1 update as well, of course, but my sympathy for Microsoft is basically spent at this point. They made terrible consumer product choices, and now they're having to dig their way out. They've done an admirable job of not being completely evil lately though.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
theApoc said:
I agree, the XBOX One is actually a lot more value for your money at launch, even with an update requirement. PS4 may play games "out of the box" but that is pretty much all it will do. Hell you can't even play CD's in the thing. Once connected to the internet, it gains a lot of features, but those things are still years behind what is offered by XBL.
Xbox One - does nothing without day 0 patch.
PS4 - does play games without day 0 patch.
So that means, Xbox One is more value at launch?

Once connected to the internet, you get acess to services on XBL that you pay for. You get acess to same services (except online multiplayer) for free on PS4.


theApoc said:
It can't be a fault in design if they intended it to be used as such. Your phone is not intended to work without a network, unlike something like a radio station. They broadcast and there are receivers available. No direct connection. Network connectivity allows a back and forth by default. XBOX One needs an update to run 100%, so does PS4. They made the importance of network connections very clear. They were BOTH designed that way. It is not a failure, in this case it is a feature.
There can be fault in design by intention. Example - DRM.
My phone is intended t work with cellular network, without internet. It can still work without cellular network. in fact, it has a special mdoe to disconnect from it by default.



theApoc said:
On you last point, that is simply untrue. Very few electronic things simply work out of the box. Phones all need updates, and account linkages, and any number of other updates. TVs, require other devices to function 100%. Sorry, but that statement is simply not true.
Phones dont need updates to work. Updates may make them work better, but they can work without them - example: my phone that works for 4 years without updates. Tvs do not require other devices. Plug in an antena and youll be watching TV. unless you consider a piece of metal "other devices". It also needs no internet connection. Fridges require no internet. Cars require no internet. Computers require no internet, every other device requires no internet to function and do its main purpose... except Xbox One.

theApoc said:
With the launch of PS4 and some of the problems I am seeing, I think consumer expectation is way too high. It is a robust piece of hardware, being shipped all over the world. It may sit in a warehouse for months and the OS is not a stagnant entity. I think you should be happy they are willing and able to update. And seriously, you are actually complaining that they want to make these things better over time.
What problems? the 0.4% failure rate (in comparison Xbox 360 was believed to be over 40%)? The poor reviews of games to launch (which is not PS4s fault)? what other problems are you seeing there, care to share your wisdom?

Yes, it is good that they are willing and albe to update. It is not good when said update is a requirement to function. Update should always be an Option, not a Requirement.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Strazdas said:
soupy twist
Heh, kind of a weird day. Usually, you and I have some kinda' dispute in something, but now I find you slamming some other guy who's trying to argue pro X-Bone when both the Sony and Microsoft fans are against it. Dark days indeed...

OT: So! Microsoft! I hear you're done with the gaming business. Couldn't you have just made sort of an announcement instead of sinking anything more into this money pit of a console? You 180'd your 180! Predictably! Or to sum it up in one word:

[HEADING=1]X-BONE'D![/HEADING]

Good fight, good night...
 

irok

New member
Jun 6, 2012
118
0
0
Half the planet updating? that's amazingly optimistic after all the other "news" they have released , every time I forget about the Xbox, they come out with a new fun reason why its crap.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
FalloutJack said:
Strazdas said:
soupy twist
Heh, kind of a weird day. Usually, you and I have some kinda' dispute in something, but now I find you slamming some other guy who's trying to argue pro X-Bone when both the Sony and Microsoft fans are against it. Dark days indeed...
Actually i often find your opinions quite good, its just that i am human, as as human i complain more than praise.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Strazdas said:
FalloutJack said:
Strazdas said:
soupy twist
Heh, kind of a weird day. Usually, you and I have some kinda' dispute in something, but now I find you slamming some other guy who's trying to argue pro X-Bone when both the Sony and Microsoft fans are against it. Dark days indeed...
Actually i often find your opinions quite good, its just that i am human, as as human i complain more than praise.
This is so. However, in this case, it's not a bad thing. I don't even buy X-Box stuff and I think this is tremendously wrong...pretty much for the sake of people who DO. Alot of my college friends use X-Box, as does my brother-in-law. They wouldn't wanna be shafted either, so the hell with this system.
 

Racecarlock

New member
Jul 10, 2010
2,497
0
0
Revolutionary said:
>People ***** and complain about the DRM
>people ***** and complain about the patch that kills the DRM and completes the OS that MShad to redo as a result of getting rid of the DRM

Damned if they do, dammed if they don't.

Solid job guys.
Well, yeah. Because you see, had they never attempted that asinine DRM scheme in the first place, this would not have been necessary. And many people who don't have internet won't be able to get the patch.
 

WeepingAngels

New member
May 18, 2013
1,722
0
0
spwatkins said:
I think people are blowing this up out of proportion. Almost every game that I bought for the 360, PS-3, WII, or WII-U seemed to require an update before it could be run. I wanted to throw that PS-3 out the window every time I turned it on to stream NetFlix and it forced me to install an update that almost always took 45 to 60 minutes.
The difference is, the games would run without the patches. The Xbone won't.
 

Lunar Templar

New member
Sep 20, 2009
8,225
0
0
any one besides me remember when 'day-1' meant you could plug it in and just play the game with out all this bullshit? technological improvements my ass.
 

Brotha Desmond

New member
Jan 3, 2011
347
0
0
Riff Moonraker said:
Um, dont you have to do something similar with the PS4? I am failing to see the big point here, other than some trying to make it an opportunity to bash on the Xbox one.
The difference is at least the PS4 can play games without the update, and you can request a disc via customer service in case you have no plans to connect to the internet. Although the basic premise is the same.
 

theApoc

New member
Oct 17, 2008
252
0
0
Strazdas said:
theApoc said:
I agree, the XBOX One is actually a lot more value for your money at launch, even with an update requirement. PS4 may play games "out of the box" but that is pretty much all it will do. Hell you can't even play CD's in the thing. Once connected to the internet, it gains a lot of features, but those things are still years behind what is offered by XBL.
Xbox One - does nothing without day 0 patch.
PS4 - does play games without day 0 patch.
So that means, Xbox One is more value at launch?

Once connected to the internet, you get acess to services on XBL that you pay for. You get acess to same services (except online multiplayer) for free on PS4.


theApoc said:
It can't be a fault in design if they intended it to be used as such. Your phone is not intended to work without a network, unlike something like a radio station. They broadcast and there are receivers available. No direct connection. Network connectivity allows a back and forth by default. XBOX One needs an update to run 100%, so does PS4. They made the importance of network connections very clear. They were BOTH designed that way. It is not a failure, in this case it is a feature.
There can be fault in design by intention. Example - DRM.
My phone is intended t work with cellular network, without internet. It can still work without cellular network. in fact, it has a special mdoe to disconnect from it by default.



theApoc said:
On you last point, that is simply untrue. Very few electronic things simply work out of the box. Phones all need updates, and account linkages, and any number of other updates. TVs, require other devices to function 100%. Sorry, but that statement is simply not true.
Phones dont need updates to work. Updates may make them work better, but they can work without them - example: my phone that works for 4 years without updates. Tvs do not require other devices. Plug in an antena and youll be watching TV. unless you consider a piece of metal "other devices". It also needs no internet connection. Fridges require no internet. Cars require no internet. Computers require no internet, every other device requires no internet to function and do its main purpose... except Xbox One.

theApoc said:
With the launch of PS4 and some of the problems I am seeing, I think consumer expectation is way too high. It is a robust piece of hardware, being shipped all over the world. It may sit in a warehouse for months and the OS is not a stagnant entity. I think you should be happy they are willing and able to update. And seriously, you are actually complaining that they want to make these things better over time.
What problems? the 0.4% failure rate (in comparison Xbox 360 was believed to be over 40%)? The poor reviews of games to launch (which is not PS4s fault)? what other problems are you seeing there, care to share your wisdom?

Yes, it is good that they are willing and albe to update. It is not good when said update is a requirement to function. Update should always be an Option, not a Requirement.
After all this you are just PS4 fanboying? Seriously? You CANNOT play the full games on a PS4 without connecting. At least not all of them. You will not be able to buy ANY game for the PS4 and play it completely without an internet connection. This is as much the doing of the publishers as it is Sony. Your statement about "working out of the box" is disingenuous and based on the assumption that PS4 was intended to be used without an internet connection. Sadly, like XBOX One, it wasn't. So while it may "work", it does very little at launch, just like XBOX. Your complaining about nothing relevant to this generation of console. 7 years ago, yes you would have had a point, now, not so much.

Tvs do not require other devices. Plug in an antena and youll be watching TV.
I am going to sum up your misconceptions about this topic with that statement. A TV in and of itself CANNOT do much of anything without an external source. I hate to tell you but an antenna is pretty much equivalent to a network router in this instance. It facilitates the TV's connection to a signal, without which it is a brick.

NEITHER console will work 100% without an update. Period. That is a fact. If you are suggesting that being able to operate something at 25% without an internet connection is better than simply connecting and operating at 100%, yeah, that is just silly. Look, enjoy your barely functional PS4 and your non networked computers. Let me know how that phone works when there is no cell signal, and tell me how great your shows look with a TV connected to nothing...
 

theApoc

New member
Oct 17, 2008
252
0
0
FalloutJack said:
Strazdas said:
FalloutJack said:
Strazdas said:
soupy twist
Heh, kind of a weird day. Usually, you and I have some kinda' dispute in something, but now I find you slamming some other guy who's trying to argue pro X-Bone when both the Sony and Microsoft fans are against it. Dark days indeed...
Actually i often find your opinions quite good, its just that i am human, as as human i complain more than praise.
This is so. However, in this case, it's not a bad thing. I don't even buy X-Box stuff and I think this is tremendously wrong...pretty much for the sake of people who DO. Alot of my college friends use X-Box, as does my brother-in-law. They wouldn't wanna be shafted either, so the hell with this system.
LOL, they can't be shafted unless someone forces them to buy a new system...
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
theApoc said:
After all this you are just PS4 fanboying? Seriously? You CANNOT play the full games on a PS4 without connecting. At least not all of them. You will not be able to buy ANY game for the PS4 and play it completely without an internet connection. This is as much the doing of the publishers as it is Sony. Your statement about "working out of the box" is disingenuous and based on the assumption that PS4 was intended to be used without an internet connection. Sadly, like XBOX One, it wasn't. So while it may "work", it does very little at launch, just like XBOX. Your complaining about nothing relevant to this generation of console. 7 years ago, yes you would have had a point, now, not so much.

Tvs do not require other devices. Plug in an antena and youll be watching TV.
I am going to sum up your misconceptions about this topic with that statement. A TV in and of itself CANNOT do much of anything without an external source. I hate to tell you but an antenna is pretty much equivalent to a network router in this instance. It facilitates the TV's connection to a signal, without which it is a brick.

NEITHER console will work 100% without an update. Period. That is a fact. If you are suggesting that being able to operate something at 25% without an internet connection is better than simply connecting and operating at 100%, yeah, that is just silly. Look, enjoy your barely functional PS4 and your non networked computers. Let me know how that phone works when there is no cell signal, and tell me how great your shows look with a TV connected to nothing...
Me, PS4 fanboy? Please stop associating me with peasants good sir!

Now that we got that out of the way....

Either you prove that PS4 cannot play games without an update or you stop saying that. Just because you repeat it, it does not become true.
Playing single player games are intended to be played without internet connection. If it is not - the game is broken by design.
Yes, Xbox is broken by design, which is why it recieves so much hate. PS4 however CAN play games without internet, which makes the problem less relevant.

Your misconception is that you consider any network equivalent of Internet connection. IT IS NOT. cellular network nor radio waves are nowhere close to internet connection. Besides, TV wont demand you to have antenna. you can do anything you want with it even if you dont have it. Like, for example, play console games without internet.
Oh wait, you cant anymore.
No, i am suggesting that being able to operate something at 25% without internet connection is better than being able to operate something at 0% without internet connection just because the makers decided to put arbitrry limitations (broken by design).
Yes, it will do more with internet, the problem is, Xbox wont do anything without internet.
"simply connecting" is a fallacy to begin with. there is nothing simple about connecting to internet, and jsut because most service prividers hide it all does not mean its not there.
And yes, my phone works without cellular connection and it has worked for years without internet connection. My TV hasnt had a cable in it for 5 years till i finally plugged it in this year. and it worked as good as ever. and i watched TV shows on it. Its just that imput was different - you know, the one that i prefer, not the one the manufacturer forced me into.

Edit: actually, i found proof you were wrong about PS4
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2427050,00.asp