Your 5 most disappointing games, 2008-2012

Recommended Videos

Mr Dizazta

New member
Mar 23, 2011
402
0
0
When I think of disappointed, I usually think of stuff that was hyped but just didn't live up to my expectations. My list in no means that the game was bad, just that it disappointed me.

1. Mass Effect 3
2. Fable 3
3. Dragon Age 2
4. Kingdoms of Amulur
5. Dark Souls
 

odanhammer

New member
Oct 11, 2009
98
0
0
aguspal said:
From the worst to the... least worst.


4) Minecraft- After doing all the "Adventure" part (As in, finding diamonds and going to the nether and blahblah), theres nothing else to do in this game, except build crap. I am not interested in building stuff because yes, I want some motivation, I need goals to complete, its just not a game for me if this does not happen. I can understand the appeal, but not for me at all.

.
Watch out that Minecraft hate can get you into a lot of trouble. I have actually talked to Notch at one time stressing the importance of goals and quests in the game. He actually promised it way back in the early days of the alpha. Yet nothing happened other then him pawning the game off to others to "finish"

I did buy the game , but i dislike Notch and Minecraft, i'll not buy into his games again.

Other game si feel are a letdown i've played.

Skyrim- i platinumed this game on my PS3 back when the game was horribled bugged. That alone killed any enjoyment i could get out of the game. I am bored of those types of huge opened ended worlds , They never feel alive with all the loading screens . Just a let down when the story kinda sucked and it was buggy.

Skyhawk- whats the deal with the game , i loved war hawk playing it for hours. Why change a system that worked that much. It wasn't anywhere as close as fun , kinda sad that happened.

Diablo 3- well i have written long rants about this game. The reason this game is a flop comes down to why blizzard will never get another dime from me. They destroyed the game , enough said.
 

Wayneguard

New member
Jun 12, 2010
2,085
0
0
denseWorm said:
Skyrim - just not as good as Morrowind or Oblivion...
Bam. This is it. One day I will write an tl;dr essay on exactly why this is the case but for today, suffice to say that Skyrim failed to draw me in like the previous games did.
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,450
0
0
MammothBlade said:
Assassin Xaero said:
MammothBlade said:
Duke Nukem Forever - I was quite looking forward to this, but it turned out to be a horrible abortion of a project, Call of Duty MW2 with Duke Nukem skins. Thankfully I didn't even touch the damn thing.
Wait... so you're calling the game MW2 with DN skins, and saying it was horrible, yet you never played it? Then how could you know any of that?
You don't have to play a game to get a general idea of what it's like. That's what gameplay videos and reviews are for.
it's true to some extent, though I wouldn't personally call it MW2 with a DN skin. I thought MW2 had a good campaign (unlike BO), but it didn't live up to CoD4. DNF...sigh I tried to play it and like it, but I just had to put it down after all the loading screens that took forever and never picked it back up again :[

I want to say Borderlands 1 but I had fun at the time, and Force Unleashed 2 was a blast to play even if the story just shat itself at the end
I was pretty sure FF13 was gonna be horrible, but...no yeah it still disappointed me :c
 

RedDeadFred

Illusions, Michael!
May 13, 2009
4,891
0
0
I didn't buy anything unless I knew I would like it so I really wasn't disappointed by anything. Actually, I guess Terraria was a disappointment but it was so cheap that it wasn't really a big deal to me. I got bored almost instantly and never played it again.

Oh, and Trenched. I got bored of that pretty quickly too.
 

RicoGrey

New member
Oct 27, 2009
296
0
0
1. Crysis 2, I was a big fan of the original and I felt like this went in a bafflingly bad direction.

2. Dragon Age 2, I was a big fan of the original and I felt like this went in a bafflingly bad direction.

3. Darksiders 2, I was a big fan of the original and I felt like this went in a bafflingly bad direction.

4. Resident Evil 5, I was a big fan of the original and I felt like this went in a bafflingly bad direction.

5. Skyrim, I was a big fan of the original and I felt like this went in a bafflingly bad direction.

Not exaggerating any of these or my reasons for disliking them.

Just so this isn't such a negative thread here are 5 games I was surprised to enjoy.

1. The Binding of Isaac, had not heard of the game, just saw it on sale on steam for dirt cheap, I have enjoyed the heck out of it.

2. Left 4 Dead 2, I enjoyed the original a tremendous amount so I figured I would enjoy this too, but I really did not think I would enjoy so much more than the first one.

3. Amnesia: the Dark Descent, Wow, just wow, loved this game, but I was actually assuming it was going to be crap based on, well I have no idea, guess it was just preconception.

4. LA Noire, I really thought this game was going to be boring, and it certainly had boring parts, but I very much enjoyed it.

5. Lead and Gold: Gangs of the Wild West, very fun game, only downside was the community never got very big.
 

Nazulu

They will not take our Fluids
Jun 5, 2008
6,238
0
0
Off the top of my head

3. Skyrim - Wasn't bad for the first 10 hours I played, but I quickly became over-powered (with all classes) and the dungeons became really repetitive.

2. StarCraft 2 - When I saw the first teaser it looked amazing. After playing for a bit at my friends place it was just lacking in atmosphere and some the designs are really poor. As for the dialogue, story and cinematics (they wasted so much money on), just as bad as the DRM and shit you had time sign up with.

1. Super Smash Brothers Brawl - I still can't believe how terrible the game play and designs are in that game. How do you go from such a beautiful fluent game like Melee, to a complete mess a long with random tripping?

All these flaws cover many other Nintendo based games as well. Such as Mario Kart Wii, Skyward Sword, Metroid Other M, The Wii itself, etc.
 

Hawkeye 131

New member
Jun 2, 2012
142
0
0
5) Brink - the story wasn't anything ground breaking but it did look entertaining, graphics were good, but overly BORING & LINEAR gameplay

4) Rage - another game that looked great, gameplay was solid, kinda buggy, BS day-1 DLC, shitty ending

3) Crysis 2 - again! great looking game but the story is SO mediocre and hard to follow, "deep layers of the suit man!", "Cell, Ceph and Hargreave man!"

2) Homefront - bugs, crappy graphics & textures, CoD/Battlefield wannabe/clone w/e, linear gameplay, mediocre & unplausible story, what a piece of shit!

1) Mass Effect 3 - BS day-1 DLC, choices don't matter, the "A" button does EVERYTHING!!!, deus ex: machina plot, massive plot holes, worse ending in sci-fi history, retarded lead writer and ex. producer throw out the entire established lore, canon and story for they're own "artistic integrity", to many goddamn fetch quests, broken quest log, NO exploration like ME1 & 2, the list goes on & on & on... Multiplayer was fun though!

-Hawk
 

CityofTreez

New member
Sep 2, 2011
367
0
0
5. Portal - it's not bad, but it got so much hype that I expected gold but instead I got a 2hr experience with boring puzzles. And besides, Portal 2 is far better story wise.

4. Fallout 3 - Gameplay is stale and lifeless, dialogue is crngwothy and the NPC's are out of the 90's.

3. Battlefield 3 - What the hell? When did CoD have a baby with Battlefield? WHERE'S MY 2143?!

2. Mass Effect 3 - You know why.

1. ES4 - Just boring. Gameplay is bad, NPC's suck and the game was paced pretty bad. Expected to love it but couldn't put more than 5hr into it.
 

Jason Rayes

New member
Sep 5, 2012
481
0
0
I really don't have 5 to complain about. For me its just Final Fantasy XIII. I hated the linearity and just didn't like the characters or story that much.
 

Suijen

New member
Apr 15, 2009
195
0
0
1. The Path: BORING.
2. Doom 3: Ultra repetitive. And respawns are stupid.
3. The Walking Dead (only one part): The story doesn't really change. What a rip.
4. Oblivion: Long winded and boring and repetitive
 

krazykidd

New member
Mar 22, 2008
6,097
0
0
Hmmm this is hard . For me to be dissapointed i needed to have expectations i have like 2 i was expecting to be good . The games that dissapointed me the most are games others said were good but here we go .

Games i was expecting to be good :

FFXIII-2 . I liked the first one the second one was just plain bad .
Dragon age 2 . I really liked DA:O , wtf happened to the story?

Games other people said were good .

Bioshock .
Deus ex:HR
mass effect .
 

putowtin

I'd like to purchase an alcohol!
Jul 7, 2010
3,449
0
0
imahobbit4062 said:
Infamous 1 and 2. How could Suckerpunch make two games that have so much potential, yet the end result is a fucking mess? Both 1 and 2 (noticeably 2) has such a fucking terrible mission structure, not to mention a game that has great freedom of movement in the second you are confined to small houses and flooded swamps? What the fuck Suckerpunch? Give me a massively destroyed city with huge skyscrapers for me to traverse, not swamps and flooded towns with a character who dies in water.
Seriously? Flood Town is one small part of New Marais, and as you say Cole dies in water so it makes the area a (enjoyable) challenge to get around. The mission structure is great and if you get bored you can create your own missions.

I could go on all day about how wrong you are, but it's saturday and I have more important things to do!

O.T
1: GTA 4
2: Force Unleashed 2
3: Mafia 2
4: Fable 3
5: GTA 4
 

OniaPL

New member
Nov 9, 2010
1,057
0
0
Let me think...

1. Dragon Age 2!
2. Dragon Age 2.
3. Dragon Age 2...
4. Dragon Age 2 :(
5. Dragon Age 2 D:
 

necromanzer52

New member
Mar 19, 2009
1,464
0
0
Halo reach. Just about every change they made in regards to the game play was for the worse.
(With the exception of jet packs, but that alone does not save it.)
Also the way it messes with the canon established in fall of reach.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,247
0
0
ForgottenPr0digy said:
Shoggoth2588 said:
the space/fighter jets were called "sabers"

and Bungie did not developed Halo wars it was developed by Ensemble Studios(which went under right after this game came out) and published by Microsoft game studios
I'm pleasantly surprised that this is what got quoted on this thread! Sabers. It was Saber combat that I loved and having only rented Halo Wars I didn't realize it was developed by another studio. I just assumed it was Bungie since apparently Halo CE was originally built as an RTS...
 

Altorin

Jack of No Trades
May 16, 2008
6,976
0
0
Xbox 360's Backwards Compatibility
It didn't hit me going into the 360's lifespan, I traded in all my old xbox stuff when I got the 360 so I could afford it, so early backwards compatibility hiccups didn't bother me, but later on, during the death of the video rental store, I picked up some old Xbox games that i heard were good, Legacy of Kain and Chronicles of Riddick. Just, disappointed that neither of them worked.

Star Wars: The Force Unleashed
I was really hoping for something more like Knights of the Old Republic, but it became an inferior God of War clone. It's difficulty curve bothered me, I like games that make you feel like a badass by the end of it, and all the enemies defenses outstripping your offensive upgrades, and you just felt weaker and weaker throughout.

Fable 2
This was a game that the gaming press of the day were all rolling around in Fable's happy places and were calling it the second coming. And I bought it all hook line and sinker, and while I do understand they probably didn't intentionally trick me, I still did NOT agree with their praise. I hated it, from beginning to end. I hated everything about it.

Borderlands
I think I get it, Diablo 2, a great game, and fallout 3 another great game, combined. But I found the gunplay boring, the enemies uninspired, the difficulty incredibly wonky. I loved the introduction video, that intro music really made me want to like the game, but it just never happened. I guess I needed to play it multiplayer, but with only splitscreen available, it just wasn't good. I'm sure it's better then I think.

Resident Evil 5
I missed out on Resident Evil 4. I only played it one time and died a whole bunch. Didn't care for it. When Dead Space came out, everyone who talked about it said "It's like Resident Evil 4, IN SPACE!" but I thought it looked good, so I got it, and I loved it. Then when Resident Evil 5 came out, everyone said "boring, it's kind of like Resident Evil 4, IN AFRICA!" and I as like "sweet, that'll be like Deadspace. Wasn't at all like Deadspace. I am Disappoint.
 

Joccaren

Elite Member
Mar 29, 2011
2,597
3
43
In no particular order...

Duke Nukem Forever
Lets get the big and obvious out of the way first. An FPS from the old age coming out in the present generation? Maybe I'd escape regenerating health, 2 weapon limits, 3-4 shot deaths with rapid firing weapons and a bunch of other crap that's in modern FPS. It somewhat did some of them, but at the same time... It just didn't work. At the start I found it alright, the puzzles were something different that I've always enjoyed in games. Something other than constant shooting to do, and there were a couple of fun gameplay things that popped up, but eventually its poor optimization, overly crude tacked on humour and just general poor gameplay got to me, and I stopped playing.

Mass Effect 3
Another big one out of the way first. There was very little that 3 did better than 1, or even 2. Shooting was about it, and even that was disappointing as it was still just a, more polished, linear corridor shooter. The story and level design went down the crapper further than in ME2, dialogue mostly disappeared, choices equated to nothing and the ending was downright bad. For something I was so excited for, it basically killed my interest in the Mass Effect series. I may eventually reinstall and replay ME1, but I have no interest in the rest of the series seeing what 3 failed to bring to the table.

Dragon Age 2
Really, this was pathetic. I'm not going to argue that combat in Origins needed to be better balanced, and made just a little faster to be more interesting - it really did. However DA2... Completely the wrong way of doing it. Enemies were action game enemies, you were a mix between an action game hero and an RPG hero, and it turned out poorly. The lack of unique areas also bought the game down massively, and whilst the story wasn't really bad, it was really just a bunch of faffing about until the end. Companion customization was gone, and many things in Origins that were not executed the best, but were still interesting were simply removed rather than fixed. The game could have been average, had it not been so incredibly rushed. I cautiously await DA2 to see if Bioware have learned, or not - like with ME3.

Skyrim
Forgive me everyone, for I have sinned. I haven't played much of TES series beyond a couple of hours in Morrowind at a friends house. Skyrim was hyped to be a large, open world RPG full of interesting things to do set in a Viking like setting. It managed the open world bit, mostly, and there was stuff to do, though not interesting, but overall it was severely disappointing.
Firstly, it was nowhere near as large as I'd been thinking it would be. IMO it seemed smaller than Tasmania, and for a whole province of Tamriel I'd expected it to be larger. Of course, there are limits to what videogames can do, so I was fine with this.
What really got me, however, was how dead the world was. The AI was just... uninterested in anything. Townsfolk and civilians were boring and largely lacked personality most of the time, anyone with any personality, no matter how important, only maintained it for a short while, the quests were short and relatively uninteresting, and the dungeons were amazingly repetitive. Dragons, instead of being something awesome to go kill, became the equivalent of Ogres in DA:O. Originally you're like "Wow, Ogre, its a boss or something, awesome!", and then you're like "Ah, and ogre. Great, one enemy that won't die instantly. Might have to hit it twice". Upping the difficulty didn't make it more interesting, simply more tedious to do anything. After being so excited for it, I was severely let down thanks to the simplification of it compared to previous titles, loss of features such as custom spell making, and how dead the world was overall.

Battlefield 3
I thoroughly enjoyed Battlefield 2. IMO it got the pacing right, its maps were good, I liked the classes and most importantly it had single player for if I got sick of the people online. BF3 dropped the ball.
It looked great, and I like the idea of weapon mods, but in other aspects it just failed me.
Vehicle mods was one of them. Planes, missiles and flares. You need flares to be half effective in an aircraft, yet they're an unlock. Yeah, they're the first one, but that's not helpful if the second you lift off you have 3 missiles locked onto you. You're just screwed in cases like that. It upsets the balance of the game in favour of those with the unlocks, as all vehicle unlocks IMO do. Weapon unlocks do too to an extent, but not as much as the vehicle ones.
Map design is terrible. IMO it tries to base itself largely around set pieces as opposed to being a good map. Bases are far too close together in most maps. The majority of the map itself goes to waste because there's no reason to be there - the bases are just stuck in the middle. This is slightly alleviated in the Back to Karkand maps, thankfully, but that's not enough.
Its too fast paced compared to 2 IMO. The speed at which everything dies... isn't fun. I have never liked 3-4 shot kills with assault rifles and SMGs that fire over 60 bullets a minute. It means if someone sees you you have less than 2 seconds to live. That's not fun. That's hide and seek with who sees who first.
And most of this I wouldn't mind too much if there was single player with AI on the maps because the AI doesn't really know how to exploit these things to make the game boring. Sadly, no such option existed, and thanks to severely weighted teams online, I lost all interest in the game a while back. It had some potential, but was really just... bleh in the end.
 

Cavan

New member
Jan 17, 2011
486
0
0
1. THE 2008 RELEASE OF PRINCE OF PERSIA, I HATE YOU IN EVERY WAY THAT MAKES YOU PATHETIC AND DISGUSTING.
2. Oblivion, which I only got to play a while later. Still crap.
3. Any and every Fable game, they are all shallow, linear and terrible.
4. Diablo 3.
5. Assassin's creed Revelations.