Well yeah it is. I can get into UK servers, Russian servers and even New Zealand Servers, but rarely do I get into a 100% dinky dei Aussie Server. :SWicky_42 said:Is the multiplayer still broken for you? For the first week it was absolutely SHOCKING, but I've been enjoying great, fast connections as of late. Most fun I've had in an online FPS for a VERY long timeXxScottocsxX said:I honestly don't see where all this praise is coming from for BFBC2.
If Yahtzee actually reviewed BFBC2 for it's multiplayer I would be seeing a lot more butthurt fanboism than I am now.
The multiplayer is definitly the centre peace of any Battlefield game. I will even go as far as to say, yes, BFBC2 has a sick multiplayer that is a whole bundle of fun. The singleplayer, not so much.
But why all the praise? Is it the fanboism? The MULTIPLAYER is broken for a larger majority of people playing without a stable/playable connection. And yet EA/DICE go on promoting there half assed attempt of a launch.
Stats don't update reguarly or as they should, When some people get into a game it is full of lag, the server browser is an afterthought. I actually like this game, and yet I seem to be finding that the BETA Was more stable than it's full release.
When DICE/EA deliver on a stable/workable multiplayer only then would I ever defend or "praise" them as a Game Developer/Publisher. The constant "This is really actually the best game of all time" Absolute Bull Shite. It isn't. Its a another generic FPS that is no better than MW2.
One note about the 'high pings' - the in-game ping display is actually server-side latency that helps to absorb lag effects. The ping you see in the server browser is your connection speed.
Oh ok... so its not ping, it's latency.. fare enough.....
Im going to attempt another session tonight and see how it all goes. Im guessing from Dice's previous launch history, it may take some time to get sorted.
By no means did I say this is a bad game, I just like to enjoy a stable Multiplayer/Interface.