Basing your conclusion on what is shown in a single short clip of footage, which doesn't show the event or its entire impact area-- and then acting as if nothing happened that wasn't shown in that clip-- is not reasonable or rational.Hey... Hey buddy. You notice how my response shows actual video of the spot the rocket hit? You know, where you can clearly see the blast radius, a lack of a destroyed hospital in that blast radius, and a lack of triple digit bodies that would be impossible to remove in such a short amount of time? You think maybe basing a conclusion on video evidence rather than "Some schmuck said" might have something to do with my confidence?
Every side acknowledges casualties in the triple digits. Literally none of the involved parties deny that. Nor do international intelligence communities or reporters.
And for what it's worth, the post Agema was referring to was the one on which you replied to me, saying "THE. HOSPITAL. WAS. NOT. DESTROYED"... in response to a post that didn't claim the hospital was destroyed. That was just pretty weird.