Crysis 2 Dev Urges Fans Not to Pirate the Game

BabyRaptor

New member
Dec 17, 2010
1,505
0
0
SyphonX said:
Gee, maybe they should stop advertising the pirated copy?

What a joke... Are they serious? I didn't even know there was a pirated copy of Crysis 2 so early, but I do now, through legitimate news channels. Imagine that. They have the balls to keep the DRM in too, even though they freely advertise to the world that a pirated copy is available for download.

Dimwits.
My thoughts exactly. They're just hanging themselves.
 

Stammer

New member
Apr 16, 2008
1,726
0
0
I was kind of on the fence about whether or not I wanted to buy the game, but I feel so bad for the company that I'm leaning towards buying it. Anyone who was ever going to pirate the game has a really easy access to pirating it, plus a lot of people who probably weren't going to pirate it are probably going to do it now too.

It's just sad to see something that someone worked so hard on get abused like this.

I think about what would happen if my RPG was leaked all over the place and all my work was completely pointless.
 

mrdude2010

New member
Aug 6, 2009
1,315
0
0
bans, bans everywhere!

seriously escapism is it that hard to allow a few points on piracy to made, so they can be supported/debunked by the rest of the community? blindly taking down any post vaguely related to supporting piracy really doesn't endear yourself to the gamer population of readership, whether they pirate games or not. if it looks like you're suppressing anyone's views purely because of what they are instead of how well they defend them, it just looks bad. obviously there are exceptions, saying some ridiculous racist statement or useless flame should be removed but "i'm not sure piracy is inherently evil" is really not a probation-worthy statement
 

mrdude2010

New member
Aug 6, 2009
1,315
0
0
Anton P. Nym said:
endnuen said:
Anton P. Nym said:
Exactly how many middle-of-the-road, generic, broadest-possible-appeal, no-risks-taken games are you willing to buy to support this business model?
None. Which is why I am against the steep prices. Had the majority of the games been gems it would be justifiable. But they aren't, so it isn't.
I'll grant that you are entirely within your rights to have that opinion. I should, however, point out the consequences.

Games cost money to make, and big games cost a lot of money in the days of HD/60fps graphics with 7.1-channel sound. Developers are either going to aim for a small market and charge a high enough price to make back the costs on a few sales, or are going to aim for a big market and hope to make back the costs over a lot of sales... they're not going to aim for a niche and charge low, unless they go the indie route and use minimal graphics and as little code as possible.

That's why you see so many games with huge graphics targeting the broadest market possible, and so many developers repeating the same, proven formulas over and over again. And that's why you see so few developers taking chances on leading-edge stuff, because failure is so expensive one can kill an entire studio.

Developers won't look at your post and say, "My goodness, we really have to work to gain the support of this gamer demographic! Let's get cracking!" Instead, they'll look at it and say, "My goodness, there's no way we can gain the support this gamer demographic and afford 3 meals a day! We'll just have to write 'em off." The result? Even fewer titles you're looking for.

So, yes, you are within your rights to demand more... but I think you might want to consider the consequences of doing so.

-- Steve
i would be able to buy more games a year if the price was reduced $10-15 dollars, or even if it dropped from $60 more quickly. my PC game library is much larger than my xbox360 library even though i've been building it for much less time because the games tend to be less expensive. as a whole, i would be able to support the games industry more efficiently if they dropped the prices on their games a hair. just my viewpoint, i probably don't represent the gaming population as a whole.

also, if DLC were reasonably priced ($10 for 3 maps? seriously?) I would get more DLC, further adding to my support of the games industry. as it is, i refuse to pay $10 for 3 maps that aren't going to be used very often. more people will buy cheaper things, and the games industry could probably make up the money lost by charging slightly less money through increased sales. wii games tend to be much less expensive than ps3 and 360 games, and that console is the one that has made the most money, despite not having the most expansive or high quality library.
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
It looks like they are in the "bargaining" stage of dealing with grief. But the whineyness makes me think he is slipping toward depression.

Then there will be acceptance when he realizes there is not a damn thing that can be done about individual non-commercial copyright infringement.

The only proper solution is to ignore piracy and focus on pleasing your customers (hint: DRM does nothing to please customers but it costs money to implement.)
 

BruceyBaby

New member
Feb 17, 2008
27
0
0
If I'm completely honest, I'm glad this happened.

Crytek decided to abandon its PC exclusive flavour, which inevitably made the PC version worse than it could have been, as consoles are generations behind PCs technologically.

They give us a crappy console port? Why should I buy it? No fucking reason, that's why.
 

Xan Krieger

Completely insane
Feb 11, 2009
2,918
0
0
RadiusXd said:
leaked version is DX9 only.
why bother to pirate crappy version of games who's series claim to fame is largely graphics?
i mean, really!
Don't understand why it's a problem, I run windows Xp 32 bit and I can only use DX9 and Crysis and Crysis Warhead still looked absolutely amazing. It's not crappy when it plays awesome and looks awesome.

OT: To Crytek, I will no doubt buy Crysis 2 and you have my sympathy that this happened.
To the pirates: I hope your graphics cards melt.
 

TainInfernus

New member
Jan 21, 2008
6
0
0
Before a game is released, when the hype is at the max, review copies are given out to the most reputable gaming review magazines and sites in order for reviewers to further hype the game before release. This is how many many many of the leaks have occurred.
Here's a simple solution: STOP IT. Stop giving out release copies. Stop it. Just stop! If you must create the hype, fly the chosen golden reviewers in to the studio, have them play through the game and then fly them back. This is a cost-effective solution, in that flying someone across the country and boarding them for a few days costs, at the most, around $3000. This is lower than the CEO's dining expenses for the year (on the company card). This is a minor cost for a major company. They can afford to fly many reviewers into town to play the game without any of the risk of a leak occurring. Valve did this with the L4D2 boycotters and it was more effective than a million dollar marketing campaign ever could have been.
Take a small expense now to forego larger expenses later. It's really simple business sense but it just goes to show that these major publishers aren't taking the power of the Internet community (and the related costs) very seriously. They obviously aren't looking for an actual solution, only a perceived solution. It's funny how any sufficiently large corporation is indistinguishable from government.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
endnuen said:
NLS said:
endnuen said:
Pirates have actually done some good for pc gaming, they forced the prices to drop. That is not the case with PS3 games for instance.. Is there any reasonable explanation for the steep prices console games have? No.
Console games have to pay licensing fees to Sony/Microsoft. Since the consoles themselves are sold for less than the hardware is worth, Sony/Microsoft have to regain that money through licensing fees for all games distributed to their consoles.
How come games cost the same via PSN as they do retail? Sometimes even more.
That argument of license is bollocks.
Because the PS store is hideously overpriced, and publishers want to make the same as they do from retail, and they still have to pay the license fee to Sony.

BruceyBaby said:
If I'm completely honest, I'm glad this happened.

Crytek decided to abandon its PC exclusive flavour, which inevitably made the PC version worse than it could have been, as consoles are generations behind PCs technologically.

They give us a crappy console port? Why should I buy it? No fucking reason, that's why.
You are a very poorly researched individual.
 

ph0b0s123

New member
Jul 7, 2010
1,689
0
0
Since I spent a lot on PC upgrades recently with this game in mind, I don't think the extra for purchase price, will be a problem. I loved the first game and it's expansion. But be warned Crytek, I will be checking out the demo and the reviews for the game before purchasing, just as I would with any other game.

Am loving this idea that piracy causes PC pirces to be low though. I have news for you, PC games have always cost less than console games, has nothing to do with piracy. In fact games for computer formats (with the PC being one of the last) have always been cheaper than the console versions. All the way back to the NES.

I don't have too many fears for Crytek though. If the game is good, it will make money, if not, it won't. But don't see how there being a buggy now is worse than the inevitable pirate version on day of release. Also if the leak is only DX9 they aught to publisise, that as it would stop me from bothering with downloading the one now, if I had a mind to.

Didn't blackops get leaked as well if memory serves. They still managed to break records right?
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
I'm not sure what they're expecting but Have an idea in my mind where the Crysis guys walk into a room and see everyone playing the game and they just go "hey not cool guys" and everyone looks down and apologizes.

I hope there message gets listened to but I think most pirates are pretty set on pirating no matter what the company says. Maybe it will work though, and if it does I need to go buy some ice-skates and visit hell.
 

Discrodia

New member
Dec 7, 2008
132
0
0
I'm a semi-fan of the original (before it melted my graphics card) and so have already preordered it for my more-durable 360. But seriously, who would want to play this game so far ahead of the release, especially when the multiplayer seems to be a major focus this time around, why would some assholes want to waste their time pirating the game when one of its biggest draws is something that no one but the pirates can play for the next 5 weeks.

Seriously, I'm cool with pirating for old/inaccessible titles, but pirating something before launch just isn't cool.
 

Pinky09

New member
Sep 20, 2010
15
0
0
While i do feel bad about this, and i haven't nor will i download the pirate version of Crysis 2, in some way i feel they deserve it.
Does anyone remember the Crytek CEO saying: "We will never release a PC exclusive game again."
 

JUMBO PALACE

Elite Member
Legacy
Jun 17, 2009
3,552
7
43
Country
USA
ZippyDSMlee said:
JUMBO PALACE said:
Remember kids, stealing is wrong!
FYI copying a copy of a copies copy is not stealing.
The bottom line is, if you pirate something, you got someone's product for free. That's called stealing.
 

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,538
5
43
Ranorak said:
Now... I don't want to sound like "That guy".
But there might be a chance that this is, in fact, a glorified, heavy-pr demo.

How far fetched is it to "leak" a playable, but not complete game, urge people NOT to download it.
But in the mean time the playable "beta" is awesome enough to hype the game.

Not saying this is the case, but it would sure beat the hell of a "edgy" EA type of advertising campaign.

CAPTCHA: schoolmate ticum


yeah, i think you want the conspiracy theory forums. The ability to dl the game will significantly affect their revenue streams and cause a massive shake up within Crytek