DeathWyrmNexus said:
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
Earnest Cavalli said:
Due to the endlessly debated moral double standard that sees hardcore violence as perfectly fine for our young ones, while the slightest hint of a nipple might drive them to rape and murder like tiny Vikings, only the most horrific scenes of torture and mutilation could ever hope to acquire the AO rating, while a few seconds of naked snuggling will earn the brand faster than you can say "Larry Flynt was right!"
The reason the debate is endless is because those are the only two sides of the debate ever presented: no one ever presents the idea that it isn't about how "the slightest hint of a nipple might drive them to rape and murder like tiny Vikings" but about how sex differs from violence.
For instance: which would you rather watch with your mom--hardcore violence or hardcore pornography?
/endless debate
I am slightly disturbed that you are not so subtly hinting at the idea of an orgasm or the faking thereof as more horrible than a murder.
I don't know what kind of video games you play, but no one ever gets murdered in any game I play. The 'faking thereof' of a murder might occur in the games I play, just like it does in the plays I enjoy like _Julius Caesar_ but there's never been an actual *murder* in any of my games; in fact, considering most of the games I play where people die it's a combat situation which means these are justifiable homicides and not murders, you must be playing very different games than I am.
See, here's part of the reason the debate is endless: there's no *real* violence in video games. There's the depiction of fictitious violence, but there's no actual violence, yet people talk as if there is. On the other hand, even when a depiction of sex is fake, well, it's still kinda real.
And another part: the idea that deciding what children see or not being a matter of how 'horrible' it is--no, it isn't. It's a matter of appropriateness. Some wonderful material is nevertheless not appropriate for certain age groups--it's not that the material is 'horrible' it's that they're not ready to handle it because it's too mature. That's a big problem in this debate: the idea of corrupting a child's *morals* gets conflated with harming a child's *development*.
I mean, roller coasters are awesome, but you don't go putting a kid on a ride that's too thrilling or else they get scared in a bad way. That's the dimension that's missing from this debate, and why it's endless.
EDIT: I can see where you are coming from but I don't tend to spend my evenings watching movies with my mom... I have a fiancee' for that, which makes your question kinda odd to me. @_@
Ah, I see you've never heard of the thing called a 'hypothetical question': here, this should help you http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypothetical?qsrc=2446