Fine, I'll say it. A lot of those nostalgic adults are nostalgic about the boners they got. Making her a senior is a better choice, and considering that major Hollywood pictures almost never get made about girls of that age anyway, it just isn't happening. Will it hurt the message? Maybe. Will it make it so that we have no movies for 14 year-old girls? No, it just means we won't have any movies about teenage girls, and no coming of age movies directed towards girls (which is probably the most significant loss). It can still hit all the points that the original did, and it can do that without having to address the obviously uncomfortable issue of a bunch of 20 and 30 year old guys really feeling nostalgic for a show about 14 year-olds in short skirts.Queen Michael said:I'd say it's precisely because it's made for nostalgic adults that it's important to keep it close to the thing they're being nostalgic about.Revnak said:I don't really see how it would be that important that she be in her early teens. I suppose the puberty metaphor is lost, but late teens is still a major transition point in life that the story can be about and it works better if the movie is going to mostly be made for nostalgic adults rather than actual teens.
Edit: note, I still consider her being in Highschool to be pretty non-negotiable.
If this wasn't going to partly be made for the male audience, then yeah, I'd find the idea of having them be 14 to be fine, but it will be made with that male audience in mind, because let's face it, Hollywood lives off of the nostalgia of 20 and 30 year-old dudes.
It would be nice if Hollywood did make some movies about that highly significant transition point in a girl's life, but it just isn't going to be Sailor Moon.