you do know all three are in the business solely for the money right?Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:Plus not so many FECKIN' DISKS!TimeLord said:Why would porting a game like Mass Effect be worse on a console with more blu-ray disc space? Surely they can cram better graphics, more extras etc onto a blu-ray!
*ahem*
Sorry about that...
'Course they're going to say that this is Micro(Dare I put $)oft!
People don't put $ony for a reason or Nint?ndo!
Yes I'm not stupid, but with micro$oft it's too goddamed blatent in your face.Aiden Rebirth said:you do know all three are in the business solely for the money right?Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:Plus not so many FECKIN' DISKS!TimeLord said:Why would porting a game like Mass Effect be worse on a console with more blu-ray disc space? Surely they can cram better graphics, more extras etc onto a blu-ray!
*ahem*
Sorry about that...
'Course they're going to say that this is Micro(Dare I put $)oft!
People don't put $ony for a reason or Nint?ndo!
Square-Enix disagrees with you [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/102883-Square-Enix-Scolded-For-Misleading-Final-Fantasy-XIII-Advertising]:RollForInitiative said:Better graphics has nothing to do with total space available on the disc and everything to do with available system memory. It doesn't matter how many pretty textures you can cram onto the disc if you can't handle it all during runtime.TimeLord said:Why would porting a game like Mass Effect be worse on a console with more blu-ray disc space? Surely they can cram better graphics, more extras etc onto a blu-ray!
Square Enix justified the advertisement by saying it used cinematics for the advertisement and not actual gameplay, but it did admit it used PlayStation 3 footage. It pointed out that the advantage allowing the PlayStation 3 version to look better were "hardware differences" requiring Final Fantasy XIII to be compressed onto 3 discs for the Xbox 360, but could fit on one disc with room to spare thanks to the PlayStation 3's Blu-ray drive.
Fanboy alert!!Mexicoho19 said:And here I was thinking Micro$oft and their fanbase couldn't get anymore pathetic.
Pretty much, yeah.Spot1990 said:So you'd prefer they lied to us and acted like they cared even though they don't? Like when Nintendo released Wii motion plus, an add on that made the console do what it was supposed to do in the first place?Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:Yes I'm not stupid, but with micro$oft it's too goddamed blatent in your face.Aiden Rebirth said:you do know all three are in the business solely for the money right?Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:Plus not so many FECKIN' DISKS!TimeLord said:Why would porting a game like Mass Effect be worse on a console with more blu-ray disc space? Surely they can cram better graphics, more extras etc onto a blu-ray!
*ahem*
Sorry about that...
'Course they're going to say that this is Micro(Dare I put $)oft!
People don't put $ony for a reason or Nint?ndo!
ok you have no idea what you're talking about.TimeLord said:Why would porting a game like Mass Effect be worse on a console with more blu-ray disc space? Surely they can cram better graphics, more extras etc onto a blu-ray!
I will still get this despite not playing ME1, if it mattered THAT much about carrying a save over then they would have made a ME1 for the PS3!
I doubt Bioware is going to put anything more "cutting egde" on the port however it only means that people will have one disk insead of 2 but then again playing games off a disk is a no,no.TimeLord said:Why would porting a game like Mass Effect be worse on a console with more blu-ray disc space? Surely they can cram better graphics, more extras etc onto a blu-ray!
I will still get this despite not playing ME1, if it mattered THAT much about carrying a save over then they would have made a ME1 for the PS3!
Part of the issue, from a realistic perspective, is it used to be a much longer list for the X-Box. Not merely for game series, but for exclusive studios. Since summer began, that list has grown shorter and shorter... for Microsoft. Not much noise on the flip side, with studios exclusive to Sony's mini-monolith opening the field for the rest. Since that was a winning strategy for Microsoft for so long, this seems to me less like the usual PR spin and more like a desperate holding action while they figure out what the hell to do next. They gambled on Kinect for the casual market, figuring they'd always have the core since they alone had Bungie and Valve games for the home console market, along with exclusive lines like Mass Effect. In three short months, those exclusives that could help sell the console to new core gamers and keep existing ones from jumping ship had started drying up.chemicalreaper said:Of course, you PS3 fans are so much better. /sarcasmMexicoho19 said:And here I was thinking Micro$oft and their fanbase couldn't get anymore pathetic.
How about PS3 and 360 fans just stop shitting on each other?
Both systems have their flaws. Both corporations are inherently evil because they're, well, corporations. Both systems have some good exclusives -- Xbox has Gears and Halo (which you must admit is one of the most popular and well-selling games of all time), PS3 has Resistance and Infamous 2 (which looks pretty cool, I must admit).