Most of the people here posting who say they aren't feminists or don't like to identify as feminists on this thread are simply saying that they don't identify as feminists due to all the loaded concepts that come with the word.
Nah. In reality, there is no baggage or loaded concept that comes with the word. These people simply are sexist and cannot handle women having equal rights. This is why they pretend there is baggage with the word.
When in reality, it's just butthurt men insisting that it's bad.
Men and Women are different! We think different, we act different, We are different.
This is intellectually dishonest. An average man and an average woman are somewhat different. The same is true for every group of men being different from other groups of men.
In fact,
men from different groups are, on average, more different than men are, on average, different from other women. The problem is that people like you don't understand this.
So, yes, men and women are different. And men and other men are also different. Clinging to the "they're different!" as if it had merit doesn't get you anywhere, sorry. Humans generally are very different from other humans. DUH.
Example Pay, More men take the dangerous, undesirable work and generally favour connivance over comforts. Women the opposite generally going for comfort, easy commute, benefits etc. over money. And guess what because of that men get paid more on average.
This proves that you have no idea what you are talking about. For one, the wage gap is generally
existing for people with the exact same job, so some random nonsense you made up about what jobs women take doesn't exactly help your point.
Furthermore, it's a completely idiotic argument, because
wage has nothing to do with the job being dangerous or undesirable. The jobs that are, by far, the most well paid also tend to be completely lacking in dangerousness.
Men get shat on when it comes to devour and child custody.
This is because of misogyny, actually: If you keep pushing that women should be caregivers and not men, then yes, the opposite effect is that men don't get to be. This is pretty much the consequence of misogyny. The solution here? More equality. If caregiving is not automatically a woman's job, then men would not be shat on so much there.
Proof: Scandinavic countries. The less sexism a country has, the better men stand if they want to take family time. Simple fact. IN fact: This issue is evidence for sexism in general.
Once we are at a point where nobody will give a damn if a guy stays home to take care of kids because it doesn't matter and their gender doesn't play into it, then sexism is probably over.
Until then, it's not.
And Women generally get less jail time than men for the same crimes.
Actually, this isn't true. There are many crimes where women get harsher sentences.
Murder, for example. If a man kills his wife "because she cheated", he will get a lot less jailtime than if a woman kills her husband because "he cheated". There's actually legal precedent for this in Britain, and it hasn't been challenged yet (because, lets face it, people don't exactly care about the rights of wife-killers or husband-killers).
Factually, you are wrong. Again.
So all in all I think the equal rights thing is done and does not need to go further
Actually, you're proved that we still have a long way to go. It's far from done.
Equal rights doesn't mean "men have it easier nearly everywhere, but the difference isn't AS big anymore, so we can call it a day!"
It means actually equal rights. That means that men and women can pick any task based on their
individual capability and not get into trouble for it/get equal pay.
This includes, for example, men raising kids, if they so want. This also includes both genders being taken serious when making a complaint about rape. As serious as, say, a complaint about getting your car stolen.
Not the case right now, despite false car theft reports being a lot more common than fake rape reports.
It's not a straw feminist if there actually exist people like that in the real world
By this logic, wouldn't it be okay to hate all men because a few men are insane douchebags?
Wait, you'll say - not all men are like that, so that'd be bad!
Yes. And the same goes for feminists. I'm one, and I have never seen one of these supposed feminazis in real life, nor in online communities. I have never heard anyone utter the wish to "wipe out" or "castrate" men, nor have I ever observed any "women are better than men".
In fact, the ONLY people I have seen saying the "women are better" were men on 4chan.
Who aren't known for feminism.
On the other hand, despite not being in many male-focused groups, I have seen dozens of rape-threat campaigns against women (some of which with thousands of men joining in to try to silence a single woman - takes women vs tropes, which STILL has buttdevastated men bashing her with lies), have seen hundreds of threats of physical violence against feminists IRL, and have seen these threats being carried out.
I have far more a leg to stand on if I wanted to say "all men are assholes" or "men are bad".
I don't say it. Why do you think is it more okay to say "feminism is bad" based on... a single crazy blogger who is probably a troll or actually clinically insane?