Poll: Poll: BioWare or Bethesda?

Recommended Videos

Assassin Xaero

New member
Jul 23, 2008
5,391
0
0
Bethesda. BioWares games are pretty bland and boring to me... I barely suffered through beat Dragon Age while I've played (according to xfire) 189 hours of Fallout 3.
 

Ildecia

New member
Nov 8, 2009
671
0
0
BioWare.

last bethesda game i played i got bored and tried to murder everyone. i proceded to get on the blacklist of EVERY NPC and died. always.

I understand the story in Mass Effect. I follow it. i'm not bored.


done
 

binvjoh

New member
Sep 27, 2010
1,464
0
0
Had you asked me a week ago, I would have gone with Bethesda. Now however, that I've gotten my on the absolute gem that is Mass Effect, I'm BioWare all the way.
 

xMelior

New member
Dec 29, 2010
128
0
0
BioWare vs Bethesda. I personally think that BioWare is slightly better (Mass Effect).
 

theriddlen

New member
Apr 6, 2010
896
0
0
Assassin Xaero said:
Bethesda. BioWares games are pretty bland and boring to me... I barely suffered through beat Dragon Age while I've played (according to xfire) 189 hours of Fallout 3.
Dragon Age do sucks. But it's the Mass Effect that is the ultimate payload of awesome.
 

cthulhumythos

New member
Aug 28, 2009
637
0
0
josephmatthew10 said:
Hey, all you fellow RPG fans out there!

We all know that BioWare and Bethesda are two of the biggest RPG studios in the video game industry, but which of the two do you prefer? Feel free to comment even if you don't have a serious preference.
bethesda.

i'm currently judging them off the latest game of their's i've played, and mass effect 2 isn't high on the 'games i like list' whilst fallout new vegas is.
 

Assassin Xaero

New member
Jul 23, 2008
5,391
0
0
theriddlen said:
Assassin Xaero said:
Bethesda. BioWares games are pretty bland and boring to me... I barely suffered through beat Dragon Age while I've played (according to xfire) 189 hours of Fallout 3.
Dragon Age do sucks. But it's the Mass Effect that is the ultimate payload of awesome.
I actually bought Mass Effect in some Steam sale over a year ago. Tried to play it once, might try again...
 

No_Remainders

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,871
0
0
rockyoumonkeys said:
Eh...both are great, but Bethesda loses points for having their name attached to the abomination known as Fallout New Vegas. I know they didn't develop it, but they still published it.

Bioware's games are great, but I think I still enjoyed getting lost in the worlds of Oblivion and Fallout 3 enough to even the scales.
To be fair, Fallout 3 was worse than New Vegas.

Far, far worse.
 

Whitenail

New member
Sep 28, 2010
315
0
0
I'm going to have to vote Bethesda on this one, Bioware hasn't really done it for me since Jade Empire (admittedly the only game of theirs I've played since then is Mass Effect...I didn't like it whatsoever so i wasn't motivated to try the sequel or dragon age) and they're my go-to people for games you can really take a bite out of.
 

rockyoumonkeys

New member
Aug 31, 2010
1,527
0
0
No_Remainders said:
rockyoumonkeys said:
Eh...both are great, but Bethesda loses points for having their name attached to the abomination known as Fallout New Vegas. I know they didn't develop it, but they still published it.

Bioware's games are great, but I think I still enjoyed getting lost in the worlds of Oblivion and Fallout 3 enough to even the scales.
To be fair, Fallout 3 was worse than New Vegas.

Far, far worse.
I don't see what "to be fair" has to do with anything. I don't agree with you at all. Even had New Vegas actually functioned, I wouldn't have enjoyed it nearly as much as Fallout 3.
 

akkronym

New member
Dec 4, 2010
20
0
0
While Bioware completely and totally wins the award of the two for best narrative I thing Bethesda truly accomplishes the "role-playing game" aspect of RPGs. While games like Mass Effect give you a compelling story and are also fun to play, I think the direction that was taken with games like Oblivion and Fallout 3 gave you a role and said play it. That was it, they truly let you play a character in a world and perhaps that's not what "RPGs" are. Perhaps "RPGs" are about playing a particular role, but that's not how the phrase would be defined if you looked at it away from the acronym. Bethesda's games put you in a world and let you experience it; be it a dangerous or safe experience. Where Bioware's games give you a role to experience in a world you can do little to affect in the scope of things.

I will say that I personally think Mass Effect and Mass Effect 2 were superior games to Fallout 3 and Oblivion but in terms of defining the genre, I think Bethesda made their games better.
 

No_Remainders

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,871
0
0
rockyoumonkeys said:
No_Remainders said:
rockyoumonkeys said:
Eh...both are great, but Bethesda loses points for having their name attached to the abomination known as Fallout New Vegas. I know they didn't develop it, but they still published it.

Bioware's games are great, but I think I still enjoyed getting lost in the worlds of Oblivion and Fallout 3 enough to even the scales.
To be fair, Fallout 3 was worse than New Vegas.

Far, far worse.
I don't see what "to be fair" has to do with anything. I don't agree with you at all. Even had New Vegas actually functioned, I wouldn't have enjoyed it nearly as much as Fallout 3.
Perhaps it's the fact that New Vegas (now that it's patched) works perfectly, when some of the bugs in FO3 still weren't patched when I gave up on it.
Or maybe that it's more in the style of the old Fallout games. Y'know, the ones that were actually amusing? The dark humour in it (and the ridiculously over-obvious dinosaur statue which was fucking cool) was really funny.
Fallout 3 on the other hand, went to try and be all dark and sinister and was basically just a big pile of expletives.
 

theriddlen

New member
Apr 6, 2010
896
0
0
Assassin Xaero said:
theriddlen said:
Assassin Xaero said:
Bethesda. BioWares games are pretty bland and boring to me... I barely suffered through beat Dragon Age while I've played (according to xfire) 189 hours of Fallout 3.
Dragon Age do sucks. But it's the Mass Effect that is the ultimate payload of awesome.
I actually bought Mass Effect in some Steam sale over a year ago. Tried to play it once, might try again...
After you get through the standard RPG sidequest levelup stage, the story speeds up and doesn't slow down until the ending. It is more than worth giving the game some credit till it sucks you in.
 

Sarukin

New member
Mar 16, 2009
100
0
0
I love Oblivion but i'm saying BioWare because they appear to be the only game company left that puts some effort into a games story.
Oblivions story was "Daemons over there, stab them"
 

Zack5777

New member
Sep 7, 2010
13
0
0
This is such a hard choice for a diehard RPG fan... You should have asked in a certain regard such as story, gameplay, choice, etc... I personally had to go more with bethesda on the grounds of games which are easier to role play, in the elder scrolls series you can do what you want pretty much how you want it, by comparison the story does suffer, but a good story almost needs more linearity, just look at dragon age, that story can draw you right in and old your attention, but the price is that it is more linear. Well that's my two cents worth.
 

Bloodstain

New member
Jun 20, 2009
1,624
0
0
Skratt said:
Bethesda was great, but somewhere along the way they lost the narrative inside a giant sandbox desert of a game. I think there may actually be such a thing as too unfocused, though I'm sure a few would beg to disagree.
Baron Von Evil Satan said:
BioWare. I've just always felt like the story and writing were much more immersive than Bethseda. I also always thought Bethesda's games lacked a lot of direction, it just sort of set a massive world before you and didn't really tell you where to go.
This is exactly then reason why I vote for Bethesda (in addition to the modding possibilities). I, for one, absolutely love the freedom and lack of direction you guys criticize.
Morrowind will always be one of my favourite games. <3
 

Krantos

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,839
0
0
Bioware wins when it comes to story, but the structured nature of the narrative restricts just how much RPing you can actually do. Bethsoft games just plop you in a world and let go, letting you do or be anything you want.
 

P.Tsunami

New member
Feb 21, 2010
431
0
0
Not only a vs thread, but an apples and oranges one, as well! My personal preference, though, is that I'm allergic to Bethesda's apples. Their games have a lot going for them, but not things I appreciate or look for in video games.
 

9of9

New member
Feb 14, 2008
199
0
0
I'm going to be unpopular and vote Bethesda, though it's a close call.

I'm not a fan of Oblivion or Fallout 3, but Morrowind is one of my most fondly remembered games ever, and I'm going to decide this on the criterion of 'single bestest game'.

My respect for BioWare has mostly returned largely due to the Mass Effect series, which are easily some of the best series of recent times. But ultimately, while I vastly prefer the story-driven, choice-based type of game that BioWare do, they just aren't that good at it. The plots are invariably hackneyed, cliche-ridden and thematically the games obstinately refuse to try anything new or adventurous.

Possibly the most interesting BioWare game in terms of setting was Jade Empire, but even so - rather than immerse the player into a foreign culture and mythos, it felt more like an all-too-familiar run-through of mandatory cliches and tropes.

They're good games, but not great, generally lacking in soul - at the level of a good summer blockbuster at best.

On the other hand, Morrowind came up with a wonderful lore, a beautiful, alien world that was trully unlike anything we'd seen before. At the time it was advanced enough for an RPG that it really felt captivating and mysterious. The story-telling isn't as great at BioWare's, like I say I do prefer branched dialogues and conversations, but what it lacked it made up through an extraordinary and detailed world, full of separate, smaller stories to be discovered and mysteries to be explored.

BioWare could easily make a game much better than Morrowind ever was, but they'd need to take a chance for once and try something new - break away from the traditional story mould perhaps, create a less generic world with actual character.

Until then, I'll be waiting for the Witcher 2 =P