Poll: What is Your Alignment (Escapist)?
- Thread starter Basement Cat
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Lawful Evil or Neutral Evil
I mentioned in another thread that I tend to play the social scumbag type of character who will talk his way out of a fight then sell you your own pituitary gland at wholesale price. This means I usually end up playing the 'means to an end' type or the 'selfish ass-rabbit' type. Either way I end up playing kind of an asshole. That is I did until my DM banned me from play social types after out-D&Ded him so now I play Lawful Neutral knights who swear to defend one person in the party (I roll at random to decide) then defend them against all comers whether that person is a goodie two shoes or a complete dick-blister.
I mentioned in another thread that I tend to play the social scumbag type of character who will talk his way out of a fight then sell you your own pituitary gland at wholesale price. This means I usually end up playing the 'means to an end' type or the 'selfish ass-rabbit' type. Either way I end up playing kind of an asshole. That is I did until my DM banned me from play social types after out-D&Ded him so now I play Lawful Neutral knights who swear to defend one person in the party (I roll at random to decide) then defend them against all comers whether that person is a goodie two shoes or a complete dick-blister.
I would assume chaotic neutral or, lawful neutral. I try to follow the rules but just don't give a fuck when I notice people around me also refusing to give a fuck (or when they simply have no fucks to give). So based on that last sentence I must obviously be Chaotic Neutral.
edit - When Visiting Vegas, I'll be staying at The Tropicana according to my Captcha. I hear they give you a lot of juice.
edit - When Visiting Vegas, I'll be staying at The Tropicana according to my Captcha. I hear they give you a lot of juice.
Lawful Good.
[img=300]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/Seth_Valentine/JudgeDreddPortraitLawfulGood.jpg[/img]
I've made the case before. He does not blindly follow orders. He's killed corrupt judges and Chief judges before. He's invaded other Mega Cities to deal justice to others. He administers the law to everyone in an even handed manner. He is not into society above all. He believes in justice for everyone.
[img=300]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/Seth_Valentine/JudgeDreddPortraitLawfulGood.jpg[/img]
I've made the case before. He does not blindly follow orders. He's killed corrupt judges and Chief judges before. He's invaded other Mega Cities to deal justice to others. He administers the law to everyone in an even handed manner. He is not into society above all. He believes in justice for everyone.
Either Lawful Good or Neutral Good; depending upon my mood. I'm a bit of a stickler for the rules, and I tend to mediate between arguing parties in the kindest and sanest way possible. However, piss me off and that "Lawful" part tends to get thrown out the window if I get pissed off. In the end, I will still look to Good, regardless of my mood.
Depends on whether I'm on duty or off.
On duty, Lawful Neutral, because the law must be upheld and enforced at all costs and to the letter. A good civil security officer should not concern himself with the morality or practicality of any law, nor let his feelings interfere with it's enforcement. That is their duty, after all.
Off duty, Chaotic Neutral, because there are far too many laws that prevent us from doing things we want to do and society in general is kind of a pain that just shoves more restrictions on us.
As a special bonus, I won't even complain about the Alignment system.
On duty, Lawful Neutral, because the law must be upheld and enforced at all costs and to the letter. A good civil security officer should not concern himself with the morality or practicality of any law, nor let his feelings interfere with it's enforcement. That is their duty, after all.
Off duty, Chaotic Neutral, because there are far too many laws that prevent us from doing things we want to do and society in general is kind of a pain that just shoves more restrictions on us.
As a special bonus, I won't even complain about the Alignment system.
Its not my place to care about what alignment the silly Jedi's are, if they start getting in my way i will take steps to remove them, and when i say 'remove' i dont necessarily mean 'kill them to death', that would just bring thier friends looking for some payback. Giving them a compelling reason to be physically out of the way will serve just fine.Wolverine18 said:You know I don't think they got that right. The Empire doesn't kill randomly or for fun. They just don't think life has any particular value, it is order that matters. Thus, Lawful Neutral.gigastar said:I usually run with Lawful Evil. It helps that im Dangerously Genre Savvy [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DangerouslyGenreSavvy] when it comes to staying in power.
One Vision. One Purpose. Peace Through Power.
The Jedi are probably also LN.
I'd say Lawful Good with streaks of Chaotic Good. While I'll try to stay within the bounds of the law, the law can also be abused and downright wrong in some cases, which can really rustle my jimmies.
Of course, I naturally see myself as the protagonist of my own story, which inevitably means I'm the villain in someone else's story, right? Through someone else's eyes, I'm probably nothing but Chaotic Evil.
Of course, I naturally see myself as the protagonist of my own story, which inevitably means I'm the villain in someone else's story, right? Through someone else's eyes, I'm probably nothing but Chaotic Evil.
True Neutral. Because I simply do not care enough to be especially good or evil, nor do I care enough to be especially chaotic or lawful. It's also partially because I just sorta do what I enjoy without regard to how other people will view me. I just don't care.
"Think of it like.. like this bag.. is... is full of all my fucks. You're not... you're not getting any of them."
"Think of it like.. like this bag.. is... is full of all my fucks. You're not... you're not getting any of them."
I act lawful good generally, but personality-wise I'm more on the side of lawful evil. Take that as you will.
At face value I would be inclined to say Chaotic Neutral.
However having recently picked up Baldur's Gate again, it seems fairly confident that Chaotic Neutral is strictly for nutjobs and people who are just plain unreliable and inconsistent. I don't really see how that makes any sense, but then again I barely know how this even works so w/e.
Edit: Took one of those alignment test things, sure enough I came up with Chaotic Neutral. Seems to offer a view of it that wasn't quite as...derisive as the one I'd read before.
However having recently picked up Baldur's Gate again, it seems fairly confident that Chaotic Neutral is strictly for nutjobs and people who are just plain unreliable and inconsistent. I don't really see how that makes any sense, but then again I barely know how this even works so w/e.
Edit: Took one of those alignment test things, sure enough I came up with Chaotic Neutral. Seems to offer a view of it that wasn't quite as...derisive as the one I'd read before.
Nah. It doesn't make you a sociopath.Gottesstrafe said:
On the other hand, between your avarice, baby kissing, and your word being your bond you've got grand potential to be an honest politician. And remember--the key to being an honest politician is that you stay bought.
I probably Lawful Neutral. I'm a good citizen who never have a criminal record and help others when needed (sometimes). Granted like everyone else I have my annoyance and frustration.
According to the short quiz I just took...
True Neutral
Christ. I thought I'd at least be Neutral Good.
True Neutral
Christ. I thought I'd at least be Neutral Good.
Quick--what quiz? I forgot the site where you could go to and take a quiz to get gauged. The only site I know of now is "What D&D character am I?", and that's for more than your alignment.MelasZepheos said: