Rage Cuts Single-Player When You Buy It Used

Gorobrin

New member
Mar 16, 2011
53
0
0
Drm's suck. but Honestly i don't get whats wrong with online pass's or dlc that comes with a new copy of the game. They need some incentive to make people buy the game new because if they don't then they don't make any money...
 

A Shadows Age

New member
Mar 30, 2011
165
0
0
viranimus said:
Yeah this just went from a definite buy to an Oh fuck no for me.

You know... this would not happen if the precedents of Always on DRM and Project 10 dollar had not been begrudgingly accepted. So Honestly I dont lay the blame on IDs feet, I lay the blame on the customers who keep buying into these things and telling the publisher/developer "Its ok, I dont mind if your screwing me over, so long as its gently and with plenty of lube."

For shame, For shame.
Well you should blame them both. There would be nothing for the consumer to "accept" if the people who made the game didn't make it that way in the first place...
 

godofallu

New member
Jun 8, 2010
1,663
0
0
Goodluck competing with GOW3, BF3, and Skyrim Id. I'm sure this locked plan of yours will help your already crippled launch.

Like we needed another brown shooter anyways.
 

inFAMOUSCowZ

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,586
0
0
Honestly I think we as gamers have to boycott these types of things. Sure Rage will be great but can we let them get away with this. We got EA to change their minds now lets change ids too.
 

Mikeyfell

Elite Member
Aug 24, 2010
2,784
0
41
Am I the only one who thinks this is a good thing?

Yes.

Okay I'll go sit in the corner.
 

Blind Sight

New member
May 16, 2010
1,658
0
0
A Shadows Age said:
cainx10a said:
If you buy it used, you ain't supporting the developers, just like the pirates do. Don't see anything wrong with it, as long as this new little feature doesn't affect the legit buyers.
This, I have never understood... How the fuck do used games take away from their profits? They are fucking used, that means they were bought new and then played and traded in. That means these games became part of their profits before they became used games! How is this not just greedy assholes wanting to get paid twice for the same game?
The logic comes from the fact that used games cause retailers to buy less titles from publishers, but the numbers are small enough that it doesn't really 'hurt the developers' (which makes even less sense in terms of the way games are developed) as much as people say. And as I stated in my post, publishers still make money off of microtransactions for used games.
 

teebeeohh

New member
Jun 17, 2009
2,896
0
0
honestly while i hate DRM i never mind the stuff that is supposed to stop used sales, the only ones who get money of that are retailers. If you don't have the money just wait a month or two till the price of a new game drops. While piracy is dangerous because nobody gets money used games cost you money but you don't support the industry.
 

Catalyst6

Dapper Fellow
Apr 21, 2010
1,362
0
0
suitepee7 said:
that sounds... pretty shitty. now i will probably miss this game entirely. meh

edit:

ToastiestZombie said:
I thought bad things when i read the title, but now I know that its only small parts of the SP taht are being cut for used palyers. In my opinion this is the right way to do DRM.
no, it is not the right way to do DRM, because it is punishing gamers who have still legitimately bought a copy of the game, but could not afford to do so first hand.
It's not id's fault that you can't buy their product. I side with the devs on this, as I always do. They're completely in their right to do whatever they can to make sure that they actually get paid for the products they produce.
 

jonyboy13

New member
Aug 13, 2010
671
0
0
It's like they're asking people to pirate the game...
Really bad call.

Zetion said:
Well fuck you too id.

So guys, what are the chances that RAZOR will have it cracked within the first week?

Hehehehe.
Lol, week? I give the game 3 days top.
 

ZombieGenesis

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,909
0
0
.... What?
Seriously? Cutting the entire single player GAME of the game if you bought it second hand?

No, fuck you id. I'm not buying your game.
 

Flailing Escapist

New member
Apr 13, 2011
1,602
0
0
This sounds like something a petty kid at a playground would do.

"Hey, Billy can I play with that kickball?"

"Ten bucks, kid."

"What? But thats the school's kickball!"

"Well maybe you should've brought your own kickball."

"....Dickhead."

"What?! Oh now you don't get the kickball at all."

"What oh come on, man!"

"Fine but we're going to kick the ball back and forth."

"But I just wanted to juggle it around a little."

"WE'RE GOING TO KICK IT BACK AND FORTH!"

".....Heres ten dollars."

"Enjoy your ball."
 

Lorechaser

New member
Aug 28, 2004
80
0
0
My view: companies have been doing DRM since the beginning. I'll take this over Ubisodt, Origin, or the like. You still get the game. If you want you cannot buy the extea bit. You don't have to spin some damn code wheel each time you play.

Would I rather have none of the above? Sure. But this is way down the scale from a world ending event.


Also, are those if you waxing apoplectic - are we talking the $55 vs $60 used, or are you looking at 2 years out when the game is $30?
 

Nalgas D. Lemur

New member
Nov 20, 2009
1,318
0
0
suitepee7 said:
that sounds... pretty shitty. now i will probably miss this game entirely. meh

edit:

ToastiestZombie said:
I thought bad things when i read the title, but now I know that its only small parts of the SP taht are being cut for used palyers. In my opinion this is the right way to do DRM.
no, it is not the right way to do DRM, because it is punishing gamers who have still legitimately bought a copy of the game, but could not afford to do so first hand.
No kidding. Way to go rewarding the pirates and punishing people who own legitimate copies of the game again, guys. Not that I've been terribly impressed by Mr. Willits lately to begin with after his comments on Diablo 3, but this isn't exactly helping things.

What the heck is going on? Pretty much throughout the entirety of the 90s, id and Blizzard were two of my biggest PC gaming heroes who could do no wrong, but they've both been really screwing things up for a while now. My brain hurts...
 

Sizzle Montyjing

Pronouns - Slam/Slammed/Slammin'
Apr 5, 2011
2,213
0
0
Well they can go fuck themselves.
They have lost one sale, not much at all, but from what i can see alot of other people won't buy this too now.

Really, this is a massive dick move.
 

A Shadows Age

New member
Mar 30, 2011
165
0
0
rembrandtqeinstein said:
TheDooD said:
It's stupid as hell its a used fucking game and normally the cost of used games goes to so they can buy NEW copies. I swear why in the fuck are they punishing the used buyers when they still bought a fucking game.
Actually if you sell your new game the most likely scenario is you will buy a used game with that money. Gamestop gives you "more" money for a new game if you use that money to buy used games, and the clerks are pressured to push used games over new.

And as for used buyers still buying the game so what? The publisher didn't get a dime of that. In my opinion used games are actually worse for the industry than piracy. At least the pirate didn't walk into a store with money in his pocket for the purpose of buying a game. Used sales (gamestop) siphon that money away from the publisher at the point of sale. Gamefly is a little bit better because it is more like a library but still damaging to publishers.
No they didn't "siphon" anything. When it comes down to it what else is there to do with used games than to let them sit and dust over, people who didn't buy the game new are buying games that were bought new so that's just greedy. These used games have already contributed to their profits, their "dimes". Hey and in regards to pirates, they are not creating an entire other "industry" that provides jobs, and a living to people who otherwise wouldn't have jobs or be able to make a living.

Why the hell should a group who is already able to pay for food and a home fuck with people purely out of greed that need the income to support themselves. All of these problems could be solved by having the game "industry" get into the market of used games, which would be the same just that the game "industry" would be skimming off the top of their nice little monopoly... You know what? no. I thought about it and this is bullshit, just greed at the expense of need, nothing more.