Curiously, when it's a game that only has a purely, set-in-stone heterosexual relationship that can be formed, it's "realism". But when a game has options for both a heterosexual relationship, and a homosexual relationship (just like in real life, both exist), it becomes "liberal politicking".omicron1 said:Exact figures (and debates on referring to one side of a contentious issue as "backwards") aside, there remains a substantial playerbase(including myself) who would rather not have liberal politicking shoehorned into our escapism.Jake Lewis Clayton said:I wouldn't exactly call it half of any nation in the developed world which is against same sex relationships.omicron1 said:Huh. Shouldn't be too hard to mod out for the conservative half of the nation...
Unless america really is still that arse backwards :\
"(just like in real life, both exist)" - So do various other sorts of fetishes - will The Elder Scrolls 6 allow you to marry your dog? (Assuming Peter Molyneux doesn't get there first, of course)ShadowsofHope said:Curiously, when it's a game that only has a purely, set-in-stone heterosexual relationship that can be formed, it's "realism". But when a game has options for both a heterosexual relationship, and a homosexual relationship (just like in real life, both exist), it becomes "liberal politicking".omicron1 said:Exact figures (and debates on referring to one side of a contentious issue as "backwards") aside, there remains a substantial playerbase(including myself) who would rather not have liberal politicking shoehorned into our escapism.Jake Lewis Clayton said:I wouldn't exactly call it half of any nation in the developed world which is against same sex relationships.omicron1 said:Huh. Shouldn't be too hard to mod out for the conservative half of the nation...
Unless america really is still that arse backwards :\
Not all liberals are friendly to homosexuals, and not all conservatives are hostile to the very concept of homosexuality. Get over it, you aren't forced to engage in a homosexual relationship in the game, either way.
You don't. That's the point.Cheshire the Cat said:Man. The more I hear about this game the less I want it.
I dont wanna have to deal with friggin relationship bullshit in game. -.-;
Don't deal with it then. The whole point of it being a ROLE-PLAYING Game is that you do what you want. If you don't want to start a relationship with an NPC, don't. You don't want to kill a dragon, don't. You don't want to do a side-mission you think is pointless, don't.Cheshire the Cat said:Man. The more I hear about this game the less I want it.
I dont wanna have to deal with friggin relationship bullshit in game. -.-;
Congratulations on having an opinion. Please don't try to enforce it on others, and don't be surprised when people don't agree with you.NameIsRobertPaulson said:Ah, the ever famous "If two men can marry, what's to stop a man and a dog, or a man and a child?" rhetoric Fox News loves to spew. THERE IS ZERO WRONG WITH TWO CONSENTING ADULTS LOVING ONE ANOTHER. I applaud Obsidian for not breaking down before the people who feel the rights of many people should be oppressed because a book and its imaginary writer said so.