You seem very intent to whitewash. Anyway, no. For one thing, Azov is just the most famous example; other neo-Nazi groups have been incorporated into the military and various police forces. And Ukraine can (still!) hardly go a week without advertising one of their soldiers sporting Nazi iconography whether it's the Nazi swastika, Sonnenrad, Tottenkopf, or some other SS division symbol.
I've seen precious little of any substance outside of Azov. And that includes the Twitter-dredging you've done.
You've been presented with a carefully-curated image by a power intent on Ukraine's destruction, and a handful of (usually Russian state-affiliated) media personalities who have an avowed interest in portraying the issue as massively as possible. The actual releases from the Ukrainian government itself don't have much that could be construed as "far right" in them-- certainly far less than (say) Hungary, Russia, or the US over the last eight years. But only madmen are calling for the destruction and invasion of those countries.
And apart from merely being incorporated into the government, neo-Nazi groups were instrumental in overthrowing it in 2014. So of course they should be rewarded with regular government salaries, heavy weapons and armored vehicles.
Dramatically exaggerated by all accounts. As I've pointed out many times before, Nazi groups took part more prominently in the anti-Maidan side of that conflict, which has gone entirely uncommented by tankies altogether.
Besides which, of course, the current government isn't even the same one that came to power in Maidan. You just like to conflate Eastern European governments that weren't installed by Russia.
It also has to do with laws discriminating against the Russian minority
Let's see exactly what you're referring to here.
the apparent influence of neo-Nazis when it comes to backtracking Minsk agreement promises
Russia broke Minsk far more egregiously than Ukraine, and did so first, and did so more commonly. You're expecting one side to adhere to an agreement with an opponent that had already wholly disregarded it.
the anti-communism of the government and its proclivity for banning left-leaning media and political parties.
They banned a small selection of fringe parties, of both the far right and fat left, most of which were openly campaigning for a hostile state.
Interestingly, the only member of any banned Ukrainian party that you've tweet-quoted so far was of the far-right, so its kind of funny how interchangeable they can be.
Oh, and they also used the war as a pretext to destroy the rights of workers, but I guess that follows the highest tradition of liberal so-called democracy.
Not really "Nazi", and par for the course during wartime in almost any country under siege. Meanwhile, Russia has passed numerous strike-breaker and monumentally oppressive anti-worker ordinances during the same timeframe, while also conscripting poor Russians to kill themselves (and yes, it is specifically poor Russians-- remember they wrote an exemption in specifically for wealthy private schools).
Then as more circumstantial evidence there is the propensity for neo-Nazis outside of Ukraine to support Ukraine or even go there and fight.
HAH! Global fascist sentiment is overwhelmingly in favour of Russian domination-- in no small part due to Russian sponsorship of neo-fascist groups around the world.
Most of all, I'd just ask if you would term Russia "Nazi", seeing as every single characteristic here is far more prominent and extreme in the Russian government.
