What the Hell, Gearbox?

Recommended Videos

Vibhor

New member
Aug 4, 2010
713
0
0
Stavros Dimou said:
Vibhor said:
BlastedTheWorm said:
Blame 3D Realms, not Gearbox. Gearbox have had Duke for a few months, 3D Realms have been working on it for 14 years.
You shitting me?
3D realms didn't made shit for duke nukem. When the project was shifted to gearbox, it 0% complete. Everything that has been done is made by Gearbox.
No,Gearbox aqcuired 80% of the game finished.
But still, Gearbox had it for a year. They could easily remove that from the game and make it some thing more suitable. What they have right now just hinders the fun.
 

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
CCountZero said:
Crash486 said:
Why [does all games] incorporate self-regenerating health?...
...What the hell was wrong with health packs?
Well. The simple answer is that it's easier for the developers.
With the health pack system, they had to hide the stuff in nooks and crannies, or secret rooms and whatnot. That all takes extra time.
It also means that they always know how much health the player has for an encounter, which means they can scale it accordingly.

It makes things easier for the developers, and it makes it easier for the player. Whether the latter is a good thing is subjective for us all.

Personally, I prefer not having either, but if I really do need to survive three rounds, at least make it a "luck-based" system instead. Either health system is ludicrous, but the regen-system especially takes away a vital gameplay management factor.

Crash486 said:
Why do they feel to the need to force me to carry only 2 weapons at a time?
What's the point of this mechanic, and don't tell me realism.
.

Lot of games are doing it these days because MoH did it, followed by CoD, and then Halo.
And it works in those games, no complaints.

But that doesn't mean it a universal best-system-ever kind of deal.

I've never seen a system that I could describe as "realistic", but I have seen some that came closer than others, most notably the system from the old Hidden & Dangerous series, which both incorporated size-based slots and weight limitations, and restricted your movement according to weight too.
The original Rainbow 6 games did a good job with realism - head shot, or body shot were instant kills (or at least damaged you enough that that operative couldn't complete the mission) getting shot in the leg caused you to slow down, you choose which weapons to use before hand and you tell your squad mates where to go before the mission begins.
 

FallenTraveler

New member
Jun 11, 2010
661
0
0
Temah said:
At a guess, Gearbox got scared that such an anticipated game would dissapoint so they went for mechanics that they know are 'popular'.
but they didn't they basically just bought out DNF and put the damn thing in order, they did not design the whole thing. They took 3DREALMS work and are now releasing it with a little polish.
 

Wintermoot

New member
Aug 20, 2009
6,559
0
0
"herp di derp it,s to unrealistic you can carry 20 weapons herp di derp"
they were afraid that would happen and that people would find it to hard (remember part of it,s for a target group played COD for a good few years)
personally I hope the real DNF is going to be funny and includes stuff like kicking with two legs and carrying enough weapons to supply a small army.
 

Vibhor

New member
Aug 4, 2010
713
0
0
FallenTraveler said:
Temah said:
At a guess, Gearbox got scared that such an anticipated game would dissapoint so they went for mechanics that they know are 'popular'.
but they didn't they basically just bought out DNF and put the damn thing in order, they did not design the whole thing. They took 3DREALMS work and are now releasing it with a little polish.
How do you know that those mechanics were added by 3DREALMS, not Gearbox?
The game was 75-80% complete but lacked anything that actually made it a duke nukem game so?
 

Projo

New member
Aug 3, 2009
204
0
0
HEY GUYS


Duke Nukem 3D played using Doom mechanics (popular FPS at the time)!


Duke Nukem Forever is going to play using Halo mechanics (popular FPS at the time)!

This is not surprising in the least. What makes a good Duke Nukem game is not the elements you feel are missing, as Duke is just an over the top parody of recent games. Expect Chief to be this gen's "one doomed space marine".
 

Sharalon

New member
Jan 19, 2011
320
0
0
Yeah, I was looking forward to something crazy like Serious Sam with fast gameplay, but all I got was Halo: Douchebag Edition...

Don't know who to blame though. Gearbox have never done this before as far as I know.

Croteam, if you turn Serious Sam 3 into another generic shooter, someone should send LulzSec on you!
 

Shydrow

New member
Feb 8, 2010
71
0
0
Alien Mole said:
MiracleOfSound said:
Yup.

The problem with this system is that the main selling point Duke has is being an 'old school' shooter, yet it's conforming to current mechanics which, when placed next to other games using the same mechanics, just show how mediocre it is in comparison.

The demo was very poor. I hope the full game build is a lot better.
With only about a week between demo and full game release? I honestly don't see it happening. If Gearbox cares they might listen to fan feedback and tweak a few things, but how could the demo be that different from the finished product?

Unless they're pulling a switcheroo the likes of which hasn't been seen since the Raiden/Snake thing, of course. Right after the demo segment Duke says 'bugger that' and suddenly starts lugging around a small armoury. Because that's totally going to happen.
The demo has been around since Pax2010 it is really old.
 

Vibhor

New member
Aug 4, 2010
713
0
0
Projo said:
HEY GUYS


Duke Nukem 3D played using Doom mechanics (popular FPS at the time)!


Duke Nukem Forever is going to play using Halo mechanics (popular FPS at the time)!

This is not surprising in the least. What makes a good Duke Nukem game is not the elements you feel are missing, as Duke is just an over the top parody of recent games. Expect Chief to be this gen's "one doomed space marine".
I don't know under which rock you have been living but Halo is no longer "the FPS" of the time. Its call of duty. That is exactly the problem. DNF is the living example why games like call of duty shouldn't exist.
 

ThePuzzldPirate

New member
Oct 4, 2009
494
0
0
People need to relax, I know I want a good Duke Nukem game as the next person but it won't be this game. The next however is under gearbox's complete control as they now own the IP, right now...they are just polishing a turd to get it out.
 

Hyper-space

New member
Nov 25, 2008
1,361
0
0
Crash486 said:
Why is it every fps developer these days feels the need to incorporate self-regenerating health and the 2 weapon arsenal. Why won't these mechanics die? What the hell was wrong with health packs? Why do they feel to the need to force me to carry only 2 weapons at a time? What's the point of this mechanic, and don't tell me realism.
"Oh look! someone who doesn't know shit about game-design trying to pass of his opinion as fact!"

Do you know why some developers have regenerative-health and two-weapon limits? because it suits the gameplay, that is, its a design-choice. A game like Just Cause 2 doesn't benefit from having regenerative health due to the gameplay being over-the-top and dependent on the player being able to do all manners of crazy shit in an open environment, so the player has to have a lot of health. So health-packs it is.

However, in a game like Call of Duty, were the player isn't some superhuman that can take a lot of punishment (on casual difficulty, a shot to head will leave you hanging by a thread), there has to be a lot of places to take cover AND a mechanic that allows the player to keep on fighting without having to search for a health-pack every time he gets shot (it would break the flow of the combat too much). So regenerative-health it is.

So you see, these mechanics are there for a reason, and will not die just because of mindless nostalgia.
 

Vibhor

New member
Aug 4, 2010
713
0
0
Hyper-space said:
I could have believed this post but you missed a completely important absolute fucking necessary fact. Its that Duke Nukem Forever is supposed to be the over the top type game not your fucking call of duty.
Also Just Cause 2 had health regen.
 

Olecksandr Babiak

New member
Jun 5, 2011
17
0
0
"Before playing DNF demo" Holy ass, the wait is over `n stuff ! let's see what`s the world been waiting so long...
"After playing DNF demo" ...Fuck this, where`s my Bulletstorm ?
 

The_Echo

New member
Mar 18, 2009
3,251
0
0
Crash486 said:
Why is it every fps developer these days feels the need to incorporate self-regenerating health and the 2 weapon arsenal. Why won't these mechanics die? What the hell was wrong with health packs? Why do they feel to the need to force me to carry only 2 weapons at a time? What's the point of this mechanic, and don't tell me realism.
One word: Borderlands. Health packs for health and as many weapons as you can fit in your excessively large pockets.

I'd like to assume Gearbox was trying something different with DNF. Maybe these mechanics had been put in place by a company before them. DNF sort of makes more sense with regenerating health, though. It's not health per se, it's ego. And as egotistical as Duke is, it could be safely assumed that he wouldn't have a problem with bouncing back from a blow to his ego.

Though this does bring the question as to whether or not this makes his physical body immune to bullets...
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,776
0
0
dogstile said:
The point of the mechanic is to give you choice making. Call it bad reasoning if you want, but that's the official "reason".

But its ok, its a shooter with a two weapon system. Everyone shout halo clone like its a bad thing, I know how hard people hate on halo nowadays for some insane reason.
Mostly because people act like it was god's gift to first person shooters? There were shooters that were far better than it on the PC before it? And people use the phrase "Halo clone" like it was the first game to use all manner of different mechanics.

It's not a bad game, but it's not revolutionary, it was just another FPS and still is.
 

Alon Shechter

New member
Apr 8, 2010
1,283
0
0
Vibhor said:
Stavros Dimou said:
Vibhor said:
BlastedTheWorm said:
Blame 3D Realms, not Gearbox. Gearbox have had Duke for a few months, 3D Realms have been working on it for 14 years.
You shitting me?
3D realms didn't made shit for duke nukem. When the project was shifted to gearbox, it 0% complete. Everything that has been done is made by Gearbox.
No,Gearbox aqcuired 80% of the game finished.
But still, Gearbox had it for a year. They could easily remove that from the game and make it some thing more suitable. What they have right now just hinders the fun.
And you know this how exactly?
Let's not point fingers until we actually have someone who really deserves it.