Dijkstra said:
Abomination said:
What she is essentially doing is forcing his personal life into his commercial life against his wishes. The situation surrounding why the individual was driven to cheat is completely ignored because "he's an ass".
And why do his wishes matter there?
And that is the mindset I can not abide here. His relationship is over yet there seems to be some idea that the one who was cheated on is entitled to also attempt to ruin his professional career? I understand there's likely an emotional hurt going on but how are the two situations related? If he doesn't share a workspace with her how is spreading such information helping anyone?
He has no right to such a separation.
Legally, you are right, of course. One would hope people consider how the two situations are entirely unrelated.
And 'driven' to cheat? Unless there's some kind of abusive relationship going on, no excuse. People are responsible for their choices, don't give some lame excuse of 'driven'. Cheating is not some kind of solution to a dire problem, it makes no sense to claim they would be 'driven' to it. All it gives is sex. Sex is not an answer to any kind of terrible situation.
Desire for sex is not the only reason why people cheat. Relationships are far more complex than someone wanting to get off with a different person, there are usually far more underlying issues than just that. It might not be abuse, but it can be neglect.
Of course the irony of the situation is that when a woman does something like that more and more people are starting to think "No wonder he cheated on you".
And some people think Obama is Muslim. Plenty of people have plenty of beliefs that make no sense.
If someone reacts in such a manner about a situation completely unrelated because they were hurt emotionally then it's generally perceived the individual does such things on other occasions to similar slights. It actually makes perfect sense to judge someone as irrational when your only experience with them is watching them behave irrationally.